Johnson Doesn’t Know the Difference between Czar and Pundit
May 30, 2010
Yikes, the stupid is getting strong. On a thread that I generally agree with, Mr. Johnson has to stupidify it with this comment:
Do you suppose it might have something to do with that fact that Jones was being appointed to a powerful government post? And Buchanan is almost as big a has-been loser as you are, and can’t hurt anyone from his pitiful position? Suppose?
Categories: Charles "Icarus" Johnson
I’d hazard he knows the difference, however he’s attempting to create a monoculture where “divisions” such as Czar and Pundit mean the same thing. Of course if we really want to play that game, then…
Let us bust out the champaign as he’s already buried in his excrement.
And since Pat Buchanan regularly appears on MSNBC, I guess that makes it a wingnutty troofer network.
BTW….has the be-mulleted malamute had anything to say about #1 0bama fanboy Tingles Matthews blasting 0bama’s handling of the Gulf oil spill more harshly than any Republican?
I do remember his weak and tepid defense of MSNBC and Matthews referring to West Point as the ‘enemy camp’ in my waning days there.
Plus conservatives despise and disowned Pat Buchanan years ago.
I was going to say the same thing. No right wing outrage cause he’s not part of the right wing anymore.
Buchanan is no conservative. He jumped the rails a LONG time ago.
Doctor Zero has another fantastic essay up at Green Room/Hot Air. Instead of going after targets like Rand Paul that allow him to make broad, sneering generalizations, why doesn’t Chawuz put down his fruit and water stained Kindle and show us where and how men like Doctor Zero err. What say, Queeg, you ready and able to actually provide some real intellectual manna for your pack of braying sycophants?
Van Jones is a communist nutcase who was trying to cash in on green evangelism, but the American people busted his ass because our current government vets no one unless they are conservative.