Home > Animal Farm Lunacy, Charles "Icarus" Johnson, Totalitarian Progressives > The Jazz Man agrees with an Anti-Semite

The Jazz Man agrees with an Anti-Semite

June 30, 2010

The Jazz Man smears people with guilt by association with many people. Well here he is actually agreeing with anti-Semite Andrew Sullivan.

Jazz Man next you accuse people of associating with anti-Semites, think about who you are allied with. Andrew Sullivan is a Progressive anti-Semite. He is to be shunned like Pat Buchanan, instead the Jazz Man promotes him.

Sick!

Advertisement
  1. MrPaulRevere
    June 30, 2010 at 10:42 pm | #1

    One would think pony tail possesses the judgment and powers of discretion that would throw up red flags about associating with a lunatic like Sullivan. Hatred of Andrew Breitbart trumps all rational faculties evidently.

    • June 30, 2010 at 10:49 pm | #2

      He is outright supporting a hater.

  2. snowcrash
    June 30, 2010 at 10:50 pm | #3

    Palins hacked emails good. Jurnolist outed emails not good. LGF posters identities outed, good. Journolist members identities outed not good. You know if Charles could sell that info for 100k he would. But he cant because he is not trusted by the Left. LOL

    • My Little Ponytail
      July 1, 2010 at 11:00 am | #4

      And CRU’s outed emails double not good. Notice a pattern?

  3. MrPaulRevere
    June 30, 2010 at 10:50 pm | #5

    According to CJ’s rules of association, he now believes Trig Palin is Bristol’s son.

    • June 30, 2010 at 11:04 pm | #6

      Yup Andrew Sullivan is a Trig Birther. That makes the Jazz Man a Trig Birther enabler.

      • July 1, 2010 at 4:29 pm | #7

        LOL!

        Screeching Trig Birther Enabler CJ!

  4. snowcrash
    June 30, 2010 at 10:56 pm | #8

    There are similarities between the 2. They both have extreme fixations. Sullivan on Palins uterus and Johnson on racist, neonazi tea partiers. They both have made themselves laughingstocks. Probably other similarites, but I dont want to go there. LOL

    • Speranza
      July 1, 2010 at 11:55 am | #9

      and neither one of them can write a coherent sentence

  5. June 30, 2010 at 11:45 pm | #10

    How can Breitbart afford the $100,000 finer’s fee for the Journo-list contents when he’s tapped out from that first $100,000 he had to relinquish for the clear, unambiguous video footage of the Tea party protestors spitting on members of the Congressional Black Caucus and hurling racial slurs their way.
    //

    • snowcrash
      July 1, 2010 at 1:51 pm | #11

      Yep, the N word, 15 times. LOL The speed that accusation was picked up by the MSM leads me to believe it was created at Journolist..

  6. June 30, 2010 at 11:49 pm | #12

    I can’t get too excited about CJ’s concerns about privacy and ethics, considering that he outed his own anonymous Paypal contributers and stalks people who disagree with him all over the Internet.

    • Andrew Sullivan’s Powerglutes Need A Rubdown
      June 30, 2010 at 11:55 pm | #13

      yeah, he is flipping out yet again and damn near devoting all of his time to stuff at Hawkins’s site, HA, AoS, Breitbart’s sites, and Stacy McCain.

      But he is not obsessed.

      And we have always been at war with Eurasia. And asking otherwise will get you in trouble.

  7. FurryOldGuyJeans
    July 1, 2010 at 5:26 pm | #14

    How much longer before he writes an incoherent screed about why he threw Israel under the bus? He’s already made St. Pancake jokes a bannable offense.

  8. tunnelrat
    July 1, 2010 at 7:12 pm | #15

    Remember that CJ sided with a troofer (Van Jones) not long ago. He has lost all credibility because he has flip flopped on so many things. Nobody should take him or his lemmings seriously anymore. He is a sad, petulant child trapped in an obese adults body.

  9. Carolina Girl
    July 2, 2010 at 5:30 am | #16

    Breitbart was on Red Eye Wednesday morning talking abuot Sullivan and explaining why he was interrested email threads. I loved it when he said “Sullivan and other blogs.” Poor Snowball – no blog hits for you.

    Then the entire panel, including the liberal Bill Schultz, made fun of Sullivan and his obsession with Trig Palen and his hypocrisy , as he went orgasmic and used Sarah Palin’s hacked emails without any sort of privacy scruples.

  10. Orangecrush
    July 3, 2010 at 12:18 am | #17

    Charles threatens to use dirt on Malkin? Ethical? He is cut from the same cloth he complains about.

  11. July 3, 2010 at 7:38 pm | #18

    It’s somehow beyond the pale to honestly and forthrightly announce the sum you are willing to pay for a desired pile of information?

    Is it somehow morally superior to haggle over the price in a back room away from public view, or is it more related to the presumed fact that digging up dirt on people for money is perfectly fine if you are a legitimate journalist but not otherwise?

  12. Lgfissuck
    July 3, 2010 at 9:18 pm | #19

    hypocrite said what about malkins ethics?

    /

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers