Six Degrees for Thee, Not for Me
July 18, 2010
Let me get this straight: every person who writes on the same blog as someone who once appeared on a talk show with somebody who once had a report from somebody who some extreme left-wing organization has on a list of white supremacists is a white supremacist, but supporting a known terrorist organization doesn’t make one a terrorist.
Chuck (or whoever you are), you’re a fucking idiot.
Categories: Charles "Icarus" Johnson
*surely* there was some hesitation before he put that to print. he *couldn’t* be that stupid, could he?
He is that stupid. He is a liar. He is pure and simple beneath contempt trash. Anyone who donates donut money to him should be tarred and feather for being just as stupid. Low life sob is another one that ought to be deported.
He is extremely stupid and immature.
Naso is cowering too? He seemed to enjoy mixing it up in the past but I guess even he knows there is no arguing a point with Johnson. Wonder if defending imams will be the hill many commenters make their last stand on?
Percy, you cant use the same email that the gravatar acct. is registered under. LOL. Better set up a throw away email acct.
Can someone delete comments 2 and 5 please? I screwed up. lol
Yet more substantive than the racism allegations against the Tea Party.
I cannot believe Chawuz actually wrote that. The man must think we’re all fools.
In addition, he has just proven the theory that there is an intellectual convergence between leftists and Islamists. There’s no way he defends this imam if he wasn’t a member of one of the downtrodden, brown-skinned, third world types. But since Queeg is now exhibiting the leftist symptoms of cultural and racial guilt, mixed with condescending paternalism, he feels he must rise to the defense of the sorely used Muzz.
Dhimmi, thy name is Johnson.
It’s not entirely clear to me that Chawuz in writing that at all. Not only has “Charles” totally flipped sides, but “he” is a lot more careless than in the past. Not only would “Charles” circa 2006 never would have written that for political reasons, “he” wouldn’t have pulled such a bone-headed boner.
And that thing about Boehner is even more evidence.
Yeah, it’s weird. Someone posted something recently that showed CJ had made a typo in a post. That never would have happened before.
At the risk of stating the obvious, there is no equivalence between paying your taxes and freely donating to a “group”. If you don’t do the latter you are thrown in jail and yes, he really is that stupid.
Johnson was also for the handgun ban in Chicago, apparently THAT right is subject to all manner of restrictions, but the building of mosques must continue unimpeded, lest one be called a ‘religious bigot’.
He’s for anything the Right is against.
Chuck=Jimmahs lost foreskin.
Chuck=
Jimmahsthe frigid ferret’s lost foreskin./FTFY
Pretty lame Chuck
Hey, I wanted to email something funny to the admins but couldn’t find a contact email. Please advise.
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/11992_Whats_Right_With_Islam
Seems he forgot he talked about this guy before in a really judgmental way … calling him a “moderate Muslim” with quotes and all.
WHOOPS
He’s going to either disappear in the thread, start a new one and hope that no one else calls him out on his obvious hypocrisy.
That the US government—or anyone—donates money to the International Welfare Queens of “Palestine” is a disgrace.
Mad King Yertle was very huffy and puffy back when I was still there about the determinations of “the US government”—according to him, back then, the US government’s determinations about who or what was kosher was the end-of-discussion determinant. Sadly, the Mad King could not recognize that even the US government could make a mistake.
It appears that he has compounded that error, and now believes that the US government never errs.
Weird; that seems to be the one common thread that links the old Chuck to the new one. The government is always right, and anyone protesting what it’s up to is a nut.
Yes, that does seem to be the link. I was thinking about that just the other day.
SChmuck used to support the goals of Porkbusters, the group that was against government spending when the GOP was in control of Congress. When the Dems took control in 2006 he flipped into the mode that government spending is good.
Another way to read that: Chuck just called Obama a terrorist supporter.
Any way you slice this one, it’s ludicrous.
As they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Obozo IS a terrorist supporter!
It is all deliberate.
“reaction against the U.S. government politically, where we [the U.S.] espouse principles of democracy and human rights, and [yet] where we ally ourselves with oppressive regimes in many of these countries.” “I wouldn’t say that the United States deserved what happened,” Rauf elaborated, “but United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened.” Rauf further stated that “because we [Americans] have been accessory to a lot of innocent lives dying in the world,” it could be said that “[i]n fact, in the most direct sense, Osama bin Laden is made in the USA.”
Charles, you never made a clarification when I questioned your allegation in the Van Jones thread about your assertion of people being confused as to what caused 911 even weeks after. I posted, in very plain (no pun intented) fashion, that we had video plastered all over the television that explained clearly for anyone still confused.
The quote above, that just might be another reason as to why folks have questions concerning this situation.
Bottom line, you are a peddler of dishonesty. You recycle all of the usual tactics exhausted by the media which is on life support now.
We know what you are doing.
I must point out that Rauf is another broken clock who was right “twice a day” about one minor point (though wrong about everything else). The US did support Osama bin Laden against the Soviet Union. The US stance in the Cold War was morally right, but as a matter of long-term strategy, we should have chosen a different battleground that would not have involved us in backing Muslims. We’d have been better off supporting the Christians in Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia two decades later.
The Wally is merely considering the feelings of his Muslim commenters, which are more sensitive than other commenters’ . There are no persons freer from the ‘bad crazy’ than those Muslim commenters on lgf. How many are there? That is a fact not known, but I am certain that the correlator tool knows who they are.
So Dhimmi Johnson is now defending Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the same man who blames the US and the West for 9-11 and Islamic terrorism. At least Johnson is consistent now. Last year he defended the devout Muslim parents of Asqa Parvez, who murdered their own child in an honor killing (Pam Geller wanted to place a headstone on Asqa’s unmarked grave and Chuck slammed Pam saying it was a private family matter).
Dhimmi Johnon’s descent into madness continues.
His hatred of Pam Geller colors his “thinking”. Charles please see a shrink..
I can recommend several in the area. They’ll be able to put their kids through Harvard dealing with this dodo.