SanFranciso Zionist supports Sharia law

July 31, 2010

One of the biggest frauds on the internet is San Francisco Zionist. This phony and wannabe is a fanatical Obama supporter. A man who is no friend of Israel, yet she claims to be a Zionist. AN example of this fake claim is her support for Sharia law. That’s right, a so called Israel supporter backs Islamic Imperialist law. Even worse, she compares it with Jewish religious law!

For a so-called Zionist, she is displaying one of the most dishonest comparisons ever. Jewish religious law only apples to Jews and they have never seek to impose it on Non Jews. Also Jews wherever they reside always follow the laws of the land. With Sharia, the Islamic Imperialist seek to impose their way non-Muslims. Clearly this individual should be called Fraudulent Zionist.

  1. doppelganger
    July 31, 2010 at 6:41 pm | #1

    I’d love to send her to Saudi Arabia for 6 months so she can experience it first hand.
    And make sure she takes her Torah with her on the plane. They love those in Saudi Arabia

  2. wooly one
    July 31, 2010 at 7:14 pm | #2

    Crap. Posted in the wrong thread. there’s so much suck going on over there it’s hard to keep up.

    Anyway, why doesn’t he just throw Israel under the bus already. We all know it’s coming. The frozen rodent has surely been whispering her/its Grima Wormtongue musings into his ear. The only question is when.
    Any guesses on the date ?

  3. July 31, 2010 at 7:23 pm | #4

    Ok I’ll say it: Halacha and Sharia are two totally different things.

    • July 31, 2010 at 10:05 pm | #5

      She is such an ignoramus. Halacha does not order your hand cut of for theft.

  4. Giles Corey
    July 31, 2010 at 7:39 pm | #6

    I love the arrogance of the statement. “Don’t bother me with facts! I have spoken, therefore it is so!”

    What a joke Chuckcake has been reduced to.

  5. My Little Ponytail
    July 31, 2010 at 7:42 pm | #8

    Theoretically, that’s supposed to be a woman, but in San Fransisco, that’s a distinction without a difference.

  6. My Little Ponytail
    July 31, 2010 at 7:46 pm | #9

    And what part of “convert or die” doesn’t this dipstick understand? I have yet to meet a Jew with sword drawn demanding conversion.

    • August 1, 2010 at 6:22 am | #10

      As a rule they don’t like to proselytise. I’m sure there are historical reasons for this and I can sort of understand it – being Jewish is rather more of a commitment than most other religions. It’s sort of like choosing to be a monk (only you get to eat more and better food and, as for vows of silence, have you ever tried to get a jew to stop talking when he’s on a roll?)

      Anyway… they’re about as opposite as can be, Islam and Judaism. Anyone who claims they’re similar in anything other than a very superficial way has obviously never read a damn thing about either.

  7. WASVS
    July 31, 2010 at 8:06 pm | #11

    No matter how angry our theoretical Christians might be over the burning of KJV (or any other version) of the Bible, I wouldn’t expect signs calling for the execution of those responsible.

  8. Mashiki
    August 1, 2010 at 1:23 am | #12

    I guess malaysia only applies it to non-muslims…oh wait.

  9. Philip_Daniel
    August 1, 2010 at 11:48 am | #13

    “Allah is the Judge (Al-Hakam) who judges between His slaves, the Decision (Al-Hukm) belongs to Him Alone. Allah revealed His Books and sent the Messengers to judge between them. Whoever obeys the Messenger [Muhammad] is one of His pious close friends (awliya’) and will find happiness in this world and in the Hereafter. Whoever disobeys the Messenger will be one of those doomed to torment.”—Sheikh ibn Taymiyyah

    “This religion…is a declaration that sovereignty belongs to Allah alone and that He is the Lord of all the worlds. It means a challenge to all kinds and forms of systems which are based on the concept of the sovereignty of man; in other words, where man has usurped the Divine attribute. Any system in which the final decisions are referred to human beings, and in which the sources of all authority are human, deifies human beings by designating others than God as lords over men. This declaration means that the usurped authority of Allah be returned to Him and the usurpers be thrown out-those who by themselves devise laws for others to follow…In short, to proclaim the authority and sovereignty of God means to eliminate all human kingship and to announce the rule of the Sustainer of the universe over the entire earth [i.e., the Caliphate].”—Sayyid Qutb

    “Jihad on the path of Allah is a human activity to obtain the power and domination. Jihad intertwines mindset and actions of men.”—“Difficulties of Jihad” (From the lectures of Sheikh Abu Jandal Al Azdi [Kavkaz Center]), http://islam.worldofislam.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1063%3Adifficulties-of-jihad&catid=131&Itemid=44

    “Allaah has commanded us to support His religion and to wage jihad against His enemies.
    There are so many verses that enjoin jihad against the mushrikeen and fighting them until all submission is for Allaah alone; they clearly state that it is obligatory and is prescribed and is compulsory. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
    “Jihaad holy fighting in Allaah’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allaah knows but you do not know”
    [al-Baqarah 2:216]
    Rulings on jihad

    1 – Taking the initiative in fighting
    This means pursuing the kaafirs in their lands and calling them to Islam and fighting them if they do not agree to submit to the rule of Islam.
    This kind of jihad is fard kifaayah (a communal obligation) upon the Muslims. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
    “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism, i.e. worshipping others besides Allaah), and the religion (worship) will all be for Allaah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allaah), then certainly, Allaah is All-Seer of what they do”
    [al-Anfaal 8:39]
    “Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islamic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikoon (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush. But if they repent [by rejecting Shirk (polytheism) and accept Islamic Monotheism] and perform As-Salaah (Iqaamat-as-Salaah), and give Zakaah, then leave their way free. Verily, Allaah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful”
    [al-Tawbah 9:5]
    “and fight against the Mushrikoon (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allaah) collectively as they fight against you collectively. But know that Allaah is with those who are Al-Muttaqoon (the pious”
    [al-Tawbah 9:36]
    “March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor), and strive hard with your wealth and your lives in the Cause of Allaah. This is better for you, if you but knew”
    [al-Tawbah 9:41]
    It was narrated from Ibn ‘Umar that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I have been commanded to fight the people until they bear witness that there is no god but Allaah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah, and establish regular prayer, and pay zakaah, If they do that then their blood and wealth is safe from me, except by the laws of Islam, and their reckoning will be with Allaah.”
    Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 24; Muslim, 29.
    Muslim (3533) narrated from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever dies without having fought or thought to himself about fighting has died following one of the branches of hypocrisy.”
    All of these texts – and many others in the Qur’aan and Sunnah – mean that it is obligatory for the Muslims to wage jihad against the kuffaar and take the initiative in that. The scholars are unanimously agreed that jihad against the kuffar, and seeking them in their own lands, and calling them to Islam, and waging jihad against them if they do not accept Islam or accept paying the jizyah, is obligatory and has not been abrogated.
    Shaykh al-Islam (28/249) said:
    Everyone who hears the call of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to the religion of Allaah with which he was sent and does not respond to it must be fought so that there will be no fitnah and so that submission will all be for Allaah.
    Ibn ‘Atiyah said (2/43): There remains scholarly consensus that jihad is a communal obligation upon the ummah of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and if some of the Muslims undertake this duty the rest are absolved of responsibility.”—“Ruling on Physical Jihad”, http://islam.worldofislam.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=757%3Aruling-on-physical-jihad&catid=131&Itemid=44

    Shari’a and halacha alike? I don’t think so…

  10. Philip_Daniel
    August 1, 2010 at 5:45 pm | #14

    I don’t think Judaism has the concept of Tawhid al-Ubudiyyah (oneness in slavery/obedience, i.e. abject slavery to Allah i.e. following the totalitarian Shari’a in all respects) and Tawhid al-Rububiyya (oneness in governance/legislation i.e. rejecting man-made law in preference to Shari’a in all respects), unlike Islam…

    Somehow, Noam Chomsky [and I bet CJ too] has the gall to claim that the West is more theocratic than nations which impose the Shari’a of al-deenu’l-sayf…

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 695 other followers