Home > Little Green Footballs > LVQ attacks!

LVQ attacks!

August 6, 2010

This is here to use as a crosspost. But carry on, good people and behold the drooling idiot!

  1. Philip_Daniel
    August 6, 2010 at 11:33 pm | #1

    Luddie, no one is saying that there have never been “moderate Muslims” — see the Lipka Tatars of the Baltic states as one of the few examples. [However, by the strict standards of the mufasirin of the four madha'heb, they'd be tagged as munafiqin and would be recipients of takbir, thus making them murtaddin in the eyes of fiqh, rendering their blood and property mubaa' for al-mu'minin since the hudud for riddah is death]. Overwhelmingly, however, the history of Islam has been one of hostility and enmity towards the mushrik and al-qitaal and futuhat of the dar al-shirk…

  2. MrPaulRevere
    August 6, 2010 at 11:53 pm | #4

    And he calls US stalkers….insert joke here…

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 2:13 am | #5

      You guys did a whole thread insulting his post on an entire site dedicated to writing about and stalking the site you were banned from? Project much?

      Are you really that pathetic?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:20 am | #6

        Once is enough, cherie…

  3. garycooper
    August 7, 2010 at 12:04 am | #7

    It’s hilarious to know he obsessively reads this blog. LOL!

    My theory that ‘Ludes is actually Chunky has never been disproven to my satisfaction. As I’ve discussed before, not to beat a dead merkin, the two functioned as a tag-team in several “discussions” I had with the manques about the farce of AGW. Including the last one, where “‘Ludes” dared me to “say one more word,” and I did, and then I was banned. I already thought the two were one, but that clinched it for me.

    Anyway, keep providing the laughs, whoever you are! With this pernicious empty-suit in office, we need all the laughs we can get.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 2:13 am | #8

      Not to overstate the point, but…

      You guys did a whole thread insulting his post on an entire site dedicated to writing about and stalking the site you were banned from? Project much?

      Are you really that pathetic?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:19 am | #9

        You know, I was banned after one post for basically saying that Pamela Geller is not Hitler. No matter what you think of that woman (I think she’s high-strung, irritating, right about some things and wrong on others, and somewhat careless when it comes to allegiances), equating a Jewess to Hitler is ridiculous…

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:21 am | #10

        You mean the way that Rodan calls everyone a nazi, particularly LvQ?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:26 am | #11

        Or the way Charles Johnson will call anyone a Nazi who asserts that most classical exegetical texts (tafsirin) of Sunni and Twelver Shi’a Islam command offensive jihad as a mustahabb (meritorious act)?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 8:14 am | #12

        Actually Charles is very clear about the realities of Jihad. The difference is that he doesn’t believe that all Muslims are Jihadis.

  4. August 7, 2010 at 12:07 am | #13

    Awww…….I see I didn’t make the honor roll….goshdarnit.

    *waves!*

    Hiya Ludwig! Got another frothy, sanctimonious, indignant I am thEH AWESOMe and I WIN ON THE INTERNETS!!! screed in you?

    And since I see that you swing by here on a regular basis, I’ll ask you a question that- despite your proclivity for long-windedness- you never answered back on the petulant, contrarian romper room overseen by the be-mulleted malamute.

    Since your’re so eager to throw around the ‘fake patriot’ (as well as the ‘fake Jew’) label.

    “Have you ever put on the uniform for the Armed Forces of the United States of America and take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, or is acting like a little shit-flinging monkey on TeH innert00Bs more your speed?”

    Feel free to answer at your leisure. Or don’t…..I really could care less if you ride off into the sunset with Miss S or enter into a suicide pact with Cat0 in meatspace……..

    • August 7, 2010 at 12:17 am | #14

      “enter into a suicide pact with Cat0 in meatspace……..”
      Now THAT was worth a lol or two.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:35 am | #15

      So you are saying that having served in the military and taken a vow to uphold and defend the constitution gives you the right to destroy the constitutional rights of other Americans?

      By the way doesn’t the president swear to uphold and defend the Constitution, while the military oath talks about obeying the lawful orders of superiors?

      You sure you served?

    • Philip_Daniel
      August 7, 2010 at 12:54 am | #17

      Why hasn’t he attacked me yet?!

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 2:17 am | #18

      I’m not Ludwig, mr. Fenway, and if you do have a DD-214, you are a disgrace to the uniform. Real American soldiers believe in American values.

      • August 7, 2010 at 6:54 am | #19

        Funny how you and Lewd Wig attack anyone that stands for common decency. Slander people that make points or statements that you both disagree with. The proposed mosque is two blocks away from ground zero, and was HIT by parts of one of the planes that took down the WTC. FOAD

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 8:12 am | #20

        You are complaining about slander on a website dedicated to slandering those you disagree with? That is rich.

        Do you silly little wankers do anything else other than project and seethe hatefully?

  5. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:09 am | #21

    Well, he of course does the usual Ludwig sidestep. Like a good little leftist, he quotes what someone writes, and attributes other aspirations to them.

    You telelgraph your own punches, it is too easy at this point. It is like poking you with a stick anymore.

    I can say this, unlike you, I have actually put my money where my mouth is, and wore the uniform of this country in service to it. If you have any doubts, I would be glad to discuss it personally.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:28 am | #22

      So rather than writing about how he telegraphs his punches, could you address the actual point he made about denying Americans their constitutional rights is anti-American? How about you don’t side step.

      He’s also right that you are much too fat to have ever been a marine.

      • Guggi
        August 7, 2010 at 5:56 am | #23

        When and where are their constitutional rights denied ?

        Do you have a constitutional right to a certain place ?

      • Guggi
        August 7, 2010 at 6:00 am | #24

        And btw.: it doesn’t make sense to have a rational discussion with LvQ. The only answers you can get from him are: curse, libel and defame.

        He behaves like a howler monkey on speed.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:46 am | #25

        Given that you believe that all Muslims are guilty until proven innocent – you are certainly denying them the right to be treated like other Americans.

        Also, you are trying to prevent them from building a house of worship on land that they legally own.

        How can you – especially you after your rant about all of them needing to be presumed guilty play innocent and pretend you are not denying rights to other Americans who happen to have a faith you abhor?

        As to LVQ defaming, he quoted your vile prejudiced rants exactly and was spot on in calling you out as a vile racist. So really I don’t see where you get off complaining.

  6. My Little Ponytail
    August 7, 2010 at 12:11 am | #26

    Oh, the kleverness. I am not worthy…

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 2:17 am | #27

      No doubt that is why you were banned from LGF.

      • midwestgak
        August 7, 2010 at 11:36 am | #28

        I recommend you do not open that can of worms, missy. Most of the posters here were banned for reasons so juvenille it made us go, ‘huh?” WTH?

        CJ couldn’t explain it, either. Or wouldn’t.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 11:38 am | #29

        Really, he seems to be very clear that you lot were banned for being hateful, vulgar, racist, bigoted cretins who were stuck in the middle ages. I have seen no evidence to the contrary.

  7. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:12 am | #30

    Well, I read your response twice now.

    Yes, you are an idiot no doubt whatsoever.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:29 am | #31

      So, in reading that twice there, did you notice that he made a very valid point that denying American liberties to Americans is anti-American?

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 12:50 am | #32

        What liberties are denied here? Sometimes you just can’t build where you want to build. That’s the way shit works. They can build it elsewhere.

        You are mistaking “the freedom to” with “some restrictions on”. They have the freedom to, just not there.

        No bars next to schools, no pr0n shops next to a day care center…. you get the picture.

        Or you used to.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:10 am | #33

        Well it passed the zoning board didn’t it? I’m afraid as usual, you don’t have a point.

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:12 am | #34

        Greased palms – submission and bullshit. Check those poll numbers again.

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:13 am | #35

        Again, what liberties are they trying to deny?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:44 am | #36

        Why the ability to worship freely on private property that they purchased of course. Or do new lot of Republicans deny property rights these days. Wait, you always have to non-whites.

      • Guggi
        August 7, 2010 at 6:07 am | #37

        >>>>”Sarahlover said,

        on August 7, 2010 on 4:44 am

        Why the ability to worship freely on private property that they purchased of course. Or do new lot of Republicans deny property rights these days. Wait, you always have to non-whites.”<<<<

        A Mosque and an Islamic Center are not (!) private properties in the sense your home is.
        In your home you can worship ObL, Pol Pot, Stalin, Che Guevera, Hitler as long as you don't do it outside your home. Not so in a Mosque or Islamic Center respectivly. They are both open for the public.

        When have Republicans denied properties ot non-whites ?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:47 am | #38

        You are trying to deny them right now. Do you mean to say that a Church or a synagogue is not private property?

        Unless said house of worship belongs to the military or the government, it is most assuredly private property.

        Are you really that stupid?

      • mtc
        August 7, 2010 at 9:05 pm | #39

        No one’s liberties are being denied and no one on the Blogmocracy believes that Muslims are all guilty of conspiracy in the 9/11 attacks. There are mosques and Islamic community centers all over this country including the deep South. What bothers people is where Muslims choose to put these places and what is being preached within their walls. Numerous Americans accused of Islamic terror said they learned about terrorism at their local mosque like the 1993 WTC murderers did. Oh, and by the way, 2 of the 6 victims in that attack were a 6 months pregnant woman and her unborn child. When more who proclaim that Islam is peaceful demonstrate against, and excommunicate, those who would do us harm then they can build where they want.

  8. August 7, 2010 at 12:12 am | #40

    Pudwank’s irrational vitriol is so vapid it defies description. No sentient points, just a typical shotgun blast of idiotic rhetoric without substance. He’s a human machine gun with nerf bullets.

    I imagine that he’s rocking back and forth in his computer chair, rubbing his greasy little gin soaked hands and thinking “What a genius am I! Wait till Chucky sees us! He loves us!”

    LVQ, you can’t argue let alone discuss anything without showing your own immature ignorance ON ANY TOPIC.

    Grow up.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 3:35 am | #41

      Actually his point was very clear to anyone who can read. America has religious tolerance and freedom of religion as a core value and cornerstone of its social contract. To deny other Americans their basic American rights is to be anti-American.

      So would you mind explaining how you are such a supporter of America yet so clearly stand against American values?

      Also, can you demonstrate that you have the ability to read?

      • Guggi
        August 7, 2010 at 6:09 am | #42

        Where are these rights denied ? There are more than a dozen Mosques and Islamic Centers in NYC. Is this your understanding of denying rights ?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:50 am | #43

        So how many synagogues are in New York? Would you dare use that argument if Jewish people wanted to build another one?

        How many Churches? Would you dare try to use that horrid argument if Christians tried to build another?

        What about Buddhists?

        You really are an evil callous little person aren’t you?

        You actually have the cheek to claim you aren’t being bigoted or denying anyone anything. Well you aren’t denying anyone anything because the bigots like you lost the fight now and American values won. But evil little people like you sure tried.

  9. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:14 am | #44

    No, it has nothing to do with reaching maturity.

    It is all about the achieving the therapeutic half life of Ativan now.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 3:36 am | #45

      Is that the medication you are currently taking?

  10. My Little Ponytail
    August 7, 2010 at 12:15 am | #46

    Then we have this erudite turd:

    Sarah Palin’s Shocking Sex life
    littlegreenfootballs.com (clicks: 22)
    Youtube Video

    I’m just asking important questions… How else could Sarah have reached prominece without the madness incurring malevolence of the old ones?
    Isn’t it interesting that I am the only one asking this?
    You won’t see it asked on the “mainstream” media will you?
    Some say that Sarah Palin opened the Necromomicon, learned forbidden knowledge and got a hickey from the madness of the old gods. Some say she is the love slave of Hastur. Others say that she got those breast implants to please the King in Yellow. Others say she spreads her legs for the dark and bloodstained affections of Cthulu cultists in a frenzied attempt to wake the old god from his death like slumber in the sunken city of R’lyeh.
    Did you notice that Sarah Palin is in league with the tea parties and we all know that the Boston Tea party took place in a New England bay – just like the one near Arkham where the deep ones dwell? Coincidence? Maybe, but look at the pattern!
    And what about her cult? Need I say more?
    It is certainly true that when she makes speeches, people are either driven into the cult to madly gibber the thoughts of eldrich horror, or are simply rendered insane. Her warbling could well have been learned from the forbidden tongues of the deep ones. However, whether she learned to induce madness from the aftershocks of fellatiating the gibbering appendages of a shoggoth or the orgies of the deep ones is of no matter. The evil effect of her words, the madness and broken souls left in her wake, and the unspeakable horrors she creates are clear.
    She is obviously the tool of long hidden and malevolent forces which are beyond the imagination of our limited human minds. She has tasted the madness and ecstasy of Kadath and gone over the blasted plains of Leng.
    Look at the effect her presence has had on the entire GOP. Soul rending and twisted glimpses into the dark vistas of the cruel and uncaring multiverse that rend a man’s spirit apart and reduce his mind to twisted fragments of broken sanity are the only logical explanation for her power and popularity.
    Only one who believed in the utter insignificance of humanity in the face of the Old Ones could be so callous to the poor. Why help them if they are all food for Cthulu anyway? Only one with hidden knowledge knows how the old ones feed on human madness and misery – why else try so hard to spread such madness and misery?
    Surely she realizes this when she lays down in the stone circle for some affection from the unspeakable Yog-Sothath. One quickie with the old ones, under the right alignment of the stars, accompanied by some romantic cultic chanting and her mission is made all the more “clear” to her twisted mind.
    Did you ever notice that she never wears short sleeves – could it be to hide the runic tattoos copied from the Necronomicon? What of her glazed and distant stare? Could it be that her broken mind clearly wanders onto the unspeakable delights of getting face from an abomination with one hundred mouths and six foot tongues?
    Isn’t that interesting?

    Tags: Palin, Old Ones, Yog-Sothoth
    Comments:0 LudwigVanQuixote • 5 hours, 31 minutes ago

    If I didn’t know any better, I’d think he was trying to out-pervert Cato.

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:21 am | #47

      Yeah, his dog told him that.

    • Ms. H
      August 7, 2010 at 12:24 am | #48

      He’s sure in a mood. Someone send him a patch kit to fix up Miss S.

      He has been a snot since that last blowout.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:57 am | #49

        How terribly classy you women are here. It is impressive that you are more vulgar and wretched than the men.

        Is it your idea of debate, when it is rather clearly pointed out that you are an anti American harridan with no love of American values, to make obscene references to sex toys?

        How nice to see that you are nothing more than vile trailer trash.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:32 am | #50

      OMG that is brilliant! It is just like Beck, but with a Lovecraft twist.

      He has a point. The way a talentless moron like Sarah achieved such star power by spreading so much madness is Lovecraftian.

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 12:57 am | #51

        Brilliant? Damn, you’re going to trip over your standards.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:58 am | #52

        Why? You love it when Beck says that sort of thing and calls Obama Satan…

        It’s a parody dear. I guess you can dish it, but you can’t take it.

      • African Moondog
        August 7, 2010 at 5:40 am | #53

        SarahIover, pehaps you can heIp me with a something that has been puzzIing me for two years now?

        Why does the Ieft fear Sarah PaIin so much?

        “The way a talentless moron like Sarah achieved such star power by spreading so much madness is Lovecraftian.” That does not quite cover it.

        She coud hardIy be a worse Vice President than the current one. And if, God forbid, the worst came to the worst, she coud hardIy be a worse President than the current one.

        Perhaps that is why Puff Ho, Kos, FiredogIake and a once great bIog demonizes her.

      • August 7, 2010 at 7:08 am | #54

        Nobody can beat Obama for being a ****** ******* asshole who has gone further in life then his meager talents and intellect could take him. By the way how many times did you have to ******* Charles before he allowed you to post here?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 8:27 am | #55

        Heracles… That post of yours about intellect is sorely lacking in anything clever to say. Tragic really that you lot are so full of yourselves that a little self examination and honest appraisal is beyond you. But do carry on, you primitive ululations are entertaining.

  11. August 7, 2010 at 12:20 am | #56

    ‘Scuse me, but I’ve gotta go take a Ludwig. I’ll wipe my chuck and flush the cato. BRB.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 4:33 am | #57

      How clever… You ability to make scatological references marks you as a superior intellect.

      Perhaps you can address the actual points of this post without regressing to monkey poo flinging?

      Or are you one of those who has difficulty with evolution as well?

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:54 pm | #58

        Mine was nothing more than a snarky comment. Axe me a pointed question and I’ll answer it civilly.

  12. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 12:27 am | #59

    Wow! I got here from searching for the “hate site” that LVQ talked about.

    Did you people notice that you have two websites dedicated to insulting LGF, a site you were banned from, and the most clever thing you can do is claim that someone responding to an entire thread of insults is the stalker?

    You people are just as sick and insane as they say you are.

    So some thoughts before you ban me…

    Does it ever occur to any of you to defend American freedoms and liberties while you are being all patriotic or do you find the Constitution to be just annoying?

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:29 am | #60

      I bid you ad…….

      Oh wait, we don’t ban people.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:30 am | #61

        Good, so answer the very serious point he made about the only real anti-Americans are jingoistic haters like you who would deny the rights and liberties of America to other Americans.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:32 am | #62

        You are an idot, you realize that.

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:31 am | #63

      Special request to admin.

      Can we get some better trolls?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:32 am | #64

        what is an idot?

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:34 am | #65

        Oh Sarah. You caught me. I missed an i. Oh you got me.

      • My Little Ponytail
        August 7, 2010 at 12:38 am | #66

        I don’t know about you, but I just got a good shot of endorphins laughing my butt off at this one.

    • My Little Ponytail
      August 7, 2010 at 12:33 am | #67

      Hi, Ludwig. Need another windmill to tilt?

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:33 am | #68

        lol

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:33 am | #69

        Not ludwig. Really it’s not. What day is this?

    • m
      August 7, 2010 at 1:00 am | #70

      Wow! I got here from searching for the “hate site” that LVQ talked about.

      Starts off with a lie, lol.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:34 am | #71

        How curious you think so. You lot really are as paranoid delusional as claimed.

    • grimcargo
      August 7, 2010 at 6:45 pm | #72

      Stray from Bloated Bovine pos blog. Here is the bottom line. America has enough red ant hills. Enough Africanized bees.Enough walking catfish and enough kudzo. And enough Islamics whose only intent is to carry out the agenda of Allah and their Quran. Got that?

      • grimcargo
        August 7, 2010 at 6:47 pm | #73

        I forgot to say. Enough big fat bastards wedged behind their computer waging filthy dirty vile war against everything Christian Got that?

  13. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:32 am | #74

    Doorway open, missing I for idiot.

  14. August 7, 2010 at 12:35 am | #75

    Goodness…..could this be the ‘Miss S’ we’ve heard so much about?

    You guys are ignorant anti-American jingoists! WE are the only enlightened and true patriots.

    Hmm….where have I heard that before?

    next thing you know, ‘Sarahlover’ will ask us to self-deport to Pyongyang for crimes committed against the cimate.

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:37 am | #76

      What is a cimate, lol? Sorry, you know damn well that was coming.

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:10 am | #77

      Can’t be. I don’t think they have made blow up dolls that advanced yet.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:36 am | #78

        How classy for a lady.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 4:36 am | #79

      Well, supporting american rights and values is something that patriotic Americans do. Becoming hateful cretins like the Jihadis who deny religious freedoms is called being a frightened coward and a surrender gimp.

      • mtc
        August 7, 2010 at 10:35 am | #80

        It is not that we’re agains mosques in America. Building one at Ground Zero (and even though it’s only a block or 2 away, it is still very close) smacks of in your face triumphalism. There is already a mosque near there. No need for another.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:41 am | #81

        Shouldn’t the local community decide how many is enough. I have been to small towns in America that had 300 people and eight churches. If those people wanted to build a ninth, would you dare tell them that they have enough?

        As to triumphalism, they are interested in reaching out to America in their stated mission, not putting it down.

        What is repulsive is putting up corporate buildings on this “holy” ground you lot go on about. That land has the incinerated remains of Americans in it, but a starbucks on top of it is just fine with you.

        A mosque two blocks away in a Muslim neighborhood though is somehow not. You lot are seriously deranged.

  15. m
    August 7, 2010 at 12:35 am | #82

    Let’s take stock here.

    He’s happy to let the islamists spit in the eye of America, and he calls us un-American?

    O

    k.

    Hey pudwig, you don’t even care where the money comes from? You have no problem with the “symbolic victory” for islamonutz around the world? Don’t you think if they really wanted to reach out, it would be a multi-faith center?

    Oh, and you must have missed Rodan’s post at the Blogmocracy showing that by a margin of 61 to 26 percent, New Yorkers oppose the proposal to build the Cordoba House, a multi-story Muslim Cultural Center in lower Manhattan two blocks from the site of the World Trade Center.

    You must also have missed the fact that some of the very people that you are talking so much shit about in this very post come from New York themselves.

    Fucking idiot.

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:36 am | #83

      Yes, those evil, vitriolic, New Yorkers.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:37 am | #84

      Ohh you are the queen bee he wrote about! Pleased to meet you! So let me ask you. What does the first amendment mean to you?

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:39 am | #85

        Queen bee. I have his honey.

        He should try it some time.

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:40 am | #86

        Something along the lines of this, I suppose:

        http://images.biafranigeriaworld.com/Cartoons-of-Prophet-Muhammad-02.jpg

        Rather unfortunate that I had to cite some examples of free speech elsewhere to make a point about the first amendment

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:15 am | #87

        It means we have the freedom to say FUCK YOU to the Cordoba outpost and its supporters.

        God Bless America!

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 3:11 am | #88

        It means you have the right to say “f” you to the “outpost?

        No wonder LvQ says you are ugly. You really enjoy being classless and hateful don’t you?

        I used to think the LvQ was much too harsh and vitriolic with you folks. But as I read your comments I realize that you really are just mean spirited white trash.

      • Guggi
        August 7, 2010 at 7:54 am | #89

        According to the fact that LvQ’s rantings are usually full of vitriolic insults, insane defamations, sexism and vulgar swear words (a garbage collector would blush) you should simple STFU.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:59 am | #90

        LvQ is sexist? Excuse me? You little fools hang out with savage and others who write about anal prison rape and forced sodomization as a way to shut women up.

        Why does that not bother you?

        As a woman, shouldn’t that bother you?

        And vulgar swear words? I find denying groups of Americans their rights and assuming first that all are terrorist sympathizers to be much more offensive.

        If LvQ ever harmed your little virgin ears by pointing out how mind-numbingly stupid you are while using colorful language, I am sure a trash mouthed bitch like you or Princess Natasha would be used to it.

      • KGB
        August 7, 2010 at 9:54 am | #91

        White trash? Sarahlover, tell us what racism means to you.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:59 am | #92

        White trash is not about being of European descent. It is more about being arrogantly proud of being classless, uneducated, ignorant, stupid and hateful.

        So while I will grant that it is classist of me to refer to dregs of society like you as white trash it is not racist.

        After all, folks like Newton and Mother Theressa were white.

      • KGB
        August 7, 2010 at 1:42 pm | #93

        Really, then why not just say “trash”? By adding the word “white” you’re engaging in racism. You can semantically (ice)weasel your way around it all you want but it’s racism.

        Hypocrite, thy name is Sarahlover.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:44 am | #94

      So how is fairly applying the rights and liberties granted by the constitution fairly to other Americans, spitting in the eyes of America? And since the zoning board clearly approved the project, I don’t believe your numbers. But then again even if they were true, since when was it ok to let an ignorant mob tell some Americans that they have fewer rights than other Americans?

      Could you please explain how you are not spitting in the face of America?

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:18 am | #95

        I am not because I would never allow even the symbolic victory these assholes want against our country. You on the other hand are happy to do so.

        Pussy.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:11 am | #96

        Pussy?

        Nice to know that the women here are as classy as LVQ said you were.

        How about allowing its construction is a symbolic victory of American ideals of equality and religious tolerance?

    • mtc
      August 7, 2010 at 9:14 pm | #97

      I’m from near NYC currently living down South and those filthy illegal alien Muslims tried to kill my mother who was a mere 20 mi. away not to mention my cousins, 3 of my 4 brothers, and my aunt and uncle. !@#$% them and Mohammed too for leading innocent minds astray!!

  16. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:35 am | #98

    I have a better idea for you Sarah.

    The answer to your question is found very easily by just searching the archives of LGF, actually comments by most of us.

    • August 7, 2010 at 12:37 am | #99

      Sounds like too much work…..

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:38 am | #100

      So that would be a no? You don’t believe the constitution is a good thing and you hate American ideals and liberties?

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:40 am | #101

        Damn, you got me Sarah. You are you too clever.

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:43 am | #102

        Maybe someday you can show us your medals from the War on Straw:
        http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheWarOnStraw

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:00 am | #103

        So fenway is another disgrace to the uniform?

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:19 am | #104

        You’re as bad as cj with that jumping to conclusions shit, lol. Did you learn that at the hem of his skirt?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:09 am | #105

        So M, why don’t you answer the question rather than skittering away like a little twit?

  17. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 12:42 am | #106

    So seriously, do any of you care about the facts posted…

    You know…

    The mosque is part of a re-existing structure that was legally purchased. It’s two blocks from “ground zero.” The people who bought the building they are renovating have a right as Americans to build a house of worship there.

    All that good stuff?

    Do any of you “super patriots” want to explain why the constitution doesn’t apply?

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:43 am | #107

      I’ll play, for a just a little while.

      Who bought the building?

    • August 7, 2010 at 12:44 am | #108

      Close enough to have an airplane engine and debris fall through the roof, ‘super patriot’….

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:45 am | #109

        Hey, Super Patriot, wait your turn.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:46 am | #110

        Yes so? Are you equally offended by the fact that they will be building corporate buildings on the actual sites rather than a memorial or a shrine to that “hole ground?”

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:46 am | #111

        Yes, so? So who bought the building?

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:47 am | #112

        There weren’t corporate buildings there before? That’s news to me….

        Or should we be dutifully railing against corporations like…..certain political parties and blogs that had contrived, abrupt idealogical pivots?

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:48 am | #113

        The Corporate buildings are legitimate business. This is a sign of triumph and traitors like you assist the Imperialists.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:52 am | #114

        So you think this is “holy ground” and are willing to seethe about a mosque as part of another building two blocks away, but it is not sooo holy that it shouldn’t be used for profit and treated like we treat the Arizona?

        OK. Then make no more references to Pearl Harbor you hypocrites.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:54 am | #115

        Isn’t that a National Monument?

    • August 7, 2010 at 12:46 am | #116

      It’s Islamic colonialism, a slap in the face. Don’t play this little freedom of religion crap. Islam is an Imperialist movement.

      Read some history and educate yourself.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:47 am | #117

        Oh great, here you go trying to imply that somehow the past islamic transgressions, and method of building atop of the rubble left behind of certain conquests actually apply in this case.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:50 am | #118

        I know a great deal of history. I know that for a long time people here couldn’t build the “wrong type of church.” I know that was true in the south until very recently if the congregants were black. I know that for a long time synagogues were opposed and so were Catholic churches.

        There was always some mob saying the same sorts of things about a group they did not like “taking over.”

        How is your blind hatred and prejudice any different?

        And how can anyone who loves America say that freedom of religion is crap?

        Do you believe that freedom of religion is crap?

        It’s that LVQ was right about you being an enemy of America.

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:50 am | #119

        Sarahalover is so disingenuous.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:52 am | #120

        All hail Ludwig, all hail Ludwig.

        Is that what the Magic Ludwig said when you shook it?

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:52 am | #121

        Islam is an expansionist entity and you flat out lie denying so. Clearly you are a supporter of Islamic colonialism. That makes a traitor.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:53 am | #122

        Did we ever find out who bought the building?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:56 am | #123

        You seem to be having difficulty reading.

        Either the rights, ideals and liberties of America apply to Americans or they do not.

        Could it be that not all Muslims are hell bent on conquering the world? Could it be that many of them, particularly those over here, are decent hard working folks who detest the extremists?

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:00 am | #124

        That is the goal of Islam global conquest. In fact the original name Cordoba house was in reference to their 500 year occupation of a Catholic-Latin city. This is to celebrate their take over of NY.

        You are helping their agenda.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 1:01 am | #125

        No Sarah, I asked you a simple question that threw a bale a straw on top of.

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:21 am | #126

        Fenway, “sarah” only asks questions, “she” doesn’t answer them apparently.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:23 am | #127

        No, Sarahlover, not all Muslims are intent on ghazwat (holy war) and futuhat (conquests) in order to vanquish shirk (polytheism) and kufr (disbelief) and istihlal (turning haraam into halal) and istibdal (adhering to man-made instead of the Shari’a), thus imposing iman (true faith) and tawhid al-ubudiyyah (slavery to Allah) and tawhid al-rububiyyah (Allah as sole legislator) everywhere. But moderate Muslims are munafiqin or hypocrites, only a step away from murtaddun or apostates. As we all know, the hudud (penalty) for riddah (apostasy) is death in the four Sunni madhaheb (schools of fiqh, i.e. jurisprudence). Historically, when mujahedin have invaded a region of the dar al-harb and occupied and administered it thenceforth according to the Quran and Sunnah and Idjma (consensus of the ulema), they have built mosques on battlefields and on the site of former churches or synagogues.

    • grimcargo
      August 7, 2010 at 6:55 pm | #128

      The constitution is lacking in regards to alien factions invading a free society using IT against us. Just like it is lacking when it comes to the avenue to removing a pos President who sneaked in with lies and fooled people like you. People like you who have a hard time with reading comprehension. Oh wait you have an interpreter who reads for you.

  18. My Little Ponytail
    August 7, 2010 at 12:43 am | #129

    I think it’s that German blob of star trek prostate juice pretending to be a Jewish law student.

    • cjs butt plug laundromat is here
      August 7, 2010 at 10:36 am | #130

      Concur.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:43 am | #131

        wow that is clever. Though your preoccupation with male plumbing is telling. Really you ought to date Heracles. The two of you would be cute together.

  19. My Little Ponytail
    August 7, 2010 at 12:44 am | #132

    And this time, he’s concealing his LGF nic, because the Chuck may not be pleased.

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 12:45 am | #133

      I’m bored.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:46 am | #134

        Too many big words for you I’m certain.

  20. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:49 am | #135

    Does anybody have any olive oil?

    Bred crumbs?

  21. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 12:49 am | #136

    Bait, bait, bait.

    • August 7, 2010 at 12:53 am | #137

      I know who this is.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:54 am | #138

        And who am I?

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:56 am | #139

        Why don’t you come out and say coward.

        How’s your dog by the way?

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 12:53 am | #140

      Care to answer the factual questions posed to you? Oh defender of America? Why don’t you think that freedom of religion is an important enough American value to take a stand on?

      You were never a marine.

      If you were, you disgrace the uniform.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:55 am | #141

        Who me?

      • August 7, 2010 at 12:55 am | #142

        Why don’t you think that freedom of religion is an important enough American value to take a stand on?

        Islam is an Arabic based Imperialist movement. It’s goal is to Arabize and wipe out the original culture. It’s a racist supremacist movement. It’s Totalitarian and that’s why you leftistists support it.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:58 am | #143

        You are correct, I was never a Marine.

        I was a Navy Corpsman, who was attached to the Marines, which is actually under the Department of the Navy.

        Alright, can we start a cookbook or something to fund some better trolls?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:58 am | #144

        Yes you corps man. You were never a marine.

        And Rodan,

        leftistists? I am a leftistist? No, I am an American who values the freedoms better men then you died to grant all Americans.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:02 am | #145

        Hmmm…..

        Scroll through the comments here and see if there is any relation to Sarahlover’s frothy, semi-coherent ad-hominem attacks and those of a certain german composer tilting at windmills…(doesn’t get good until the 300s…..)

        http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/35170_LGF_Poll-_9-11_Terror_Trials_in_New_York

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:02 am | #146

        You are a traitor an enabler of the Islamic colonization of America. You support them because as a Progressive you have a common enemy. You are fooling no one with your phony concern for freedom of religion.

        You just want to be cool and help the muzzies. Be real and stop your act.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 1:03 am | #147

        Oh tricky. She separated the Corps from man.

        I don’t have a come back for that.

    • August 7, 2010 at 12:54 am | #148

      I understand Ludwig is a master at baiting….

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 12:56 am | #149

        I’m dying right now, you somehow figured out what I was trying to say, lol. shit

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:02 am | #150

        And just answer the question… why do Americans who were not convicted of a crime, not have the right to worship as they please?

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 1:05 am | #151

        How do you think they obtained the funds for this mosque?

  22. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 1:02 am | #152

    Hey guys, I am not ludwig and I am not whomever else has a dog you are thinking of. I’m actually a cat person, not that it matters.

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:05 am | #153

      You are a supporter of the Islamic agenda. You support Dar al Islam. Stop kidding and be real.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:06 am | #154

        I am an American who believes in the ideals and liberties of America. Denying freedom of religious expression to others is a very Islamacist sort of thing to do. The only one who sounds Islamicist on this issue is you.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 1:08 am | #155

        Yes, underwater basket-weaving 101.

        Down the corner, and to the left.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:09 am | #156

        You are the enabler. You lie that you care about freedom of religion, you don’t give a rats ass. You just want to be seen as tolerant and so you will accept a symbol 2 blocks from an Islamic attack. There are plenty of Mosques in NY, they want to to show they won, they have conquered. You know this and support it.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:24 am | #157

        I know that if you gave a real damn about the victims of the attack, you would want ground zero turned into a national monument. But you don’t. So don’t kid me this is about anything other than you hating Muslims and being a bigot.

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:26 am | #158

        Yeah, how many islamists would tell them they were welcome to build the church down the street from … well Saudi Arabia.

        An islamists would say – no more churches are to be built and the ones that are here will have to fall into disrepair because you’re not going to fix it up.

        An islamists might also say “oh what a beautiful goat you have” but that’s a whole different story.

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:30 am | #159

        That’s a bullshit argument “Sarah” – they targeted a symbol of capitalism when they took out the buildings. A kick ass symbol of capitalism right back in their face sounds pretty damn good to me.

        They can build them all around ~ I’d rather there be a monument where the towers stood. But a minaret two blocks away shreiking 5 times a frikken day? You’re outta your mind.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:47 am | #160

        M, there isn’t a minaret in the old building nor a plan to build one. That would be those zoning laws you are talking about.

  23. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 1:05 am | #161

    For all of your gibbering about your mad debate skilzz and begging to challenge someone from LGF, you idiots sure do a piss poor job.

    You are much less interesting when facing non-echo chamber views aren’t you?

    There is a serious question here. Why are you opposed to granting basic American rights and liberties to some, but not others? Since you do hate the constitution and the decent and noble things that America stands for, how can you call yourselves patriots?

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:06 am | #162

      I’ve been answering you, you ignore the truth. This is Islamic Colonialism and stop playing like you don’t know. You know it and support them.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:08 am | #163

        How is it Islamic colonialism. Just because you say it doesn’t make it so. You also think that Sarah Palin is smart, that AGW isn’t real and that wiping out all Muslims would be a good thing.

        Your track record of having a connection with reality is lacking.

        You are going to have to prove what you are saying rather than just blustering.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:10 am | #164

        It is Islamic colonialism. Why do you think it was originally called Cordoba House? It was named after an Islamic conquest. They consider 9/11 a great victory and useful idiots like you are helping them.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:14 am | #165

        An Islamic conquest? Ohhh wow… A formerly Muslim city is a mark of conquest and they are crypto showing that they are coming to take over from the name? Is that your argument?

        You are as insane as everyone says you are.

        Since you are half arab, (you brag about being part Lebanese) shouldn’t you be proud of Cordoba?

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:15 am | #166

        “A formerly Muslim city is a mark of conquest”

        Liar, Cordoba was a Spanish Catholic city before the Islamic conquest in the 700′s. It was liberated in the 1200′s. That was a Latin city, not an Arab city.

        Read some history and not propaganda.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:16 am | #167

        “Since you are half arab, (you brag about being part Lebanese) shouldn’t you be proud of Cordoba?”

        1/4 Maronite, that’s not Arab. It’s Phoenician. I’m 1/4 Spaniard, that city is Spanish.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:17 am | #168

        So the Muslims owned it for 500 years, that makes it a formerly Muslim city… Half a milenia is a long time.

        Jerusalem is formerly a crusader city. No one denies that.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:20 am | #169

        “So the Muslims owned it for 500 years, that makes it a formerly Muslim city… Half a milenia is a long time.”

        500 year occupation vs. 1700 years. It’s a Latin city, deal wit it.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:22 am | #170

        I’m not doubting it is a Spanish city. However it was a Muslim city for 500 years. Therefore calling it formerly Muslim is quite accurate.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 1:23 am | #171

        This exchange explains it.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:29 am | #172

        Explains what? And why have you not answered the question directly asked you if you are still here?

        Why do you hate America, American liberties and the constitution?

      • m
        August 7, 2010 at 1:33 am | #173

        It wasn’t just a “muslim city”. It was the capital of an Islamic caliphate.

        Not here.

      • Guggi
        August 7, 2010 at 8:35 am | #174

        >>>>”Sarahlover said,

        on August 7, 2010 on 1:17 am

        So the Muslims owned it for 500 years, that makes it a formerly Muslim city… Half a milenia is a long time.

        Jerusalem is formerly a crusader city. No one denies that.”<<<<

        Ah, so Jerusalem is – according to your insane argument – an Islamic city ? Jerusalem had been under Islamic power for about 1200 years.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 8:44 am | #175

        No, Jerusalem is a formerly Islamic city and now is under control of its rightful owners.

        However, I would like to gt back to your virgin ears and you complaints about language when you compared upholding first amendment rights to being a suicide bomber and then went on to talk about moobs.

        I do hope that you realize that a stupid, hateful, prejudiced, vile little bitch like you has no call to ever complain about language.

      • August 7, 2010 at 10:49 am | #176

        So Sarah Lover, why is Jersualem back to its rightful owners But not Cordoba? Why don’t Hispanics have a right in your mind to control what is ours? This is low class White trash welfare side showing again.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:51 am | #177

        Where did I say that Cordoba was not back to its rightful owners.

        You really have a massive persecution complex for such a proud Latin warrior. That is astonishingly weak and sniveling.

        I guess it was the Latins like you who perfected getting sunk by the British navy in 1588.

      • KGB
        August 7, 2010 at 11:21 am | #178

        For someone who allegedly found this site by searching for it, you seem well versed in Rodan’s background.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 11:26 am | #179

        I told you I read a lot at LGF. LvQ had quite the guide to you people – and the comments were very illuminating. Until I came here though, I thought LvQ was exaggerating. You are actually as wretched, ignorant and hateful as he claimed you are.

        I am very disappointed to have not “met” some of you yet.

        I would love to talk to Savage and Natasha and Iron Fist…

        Perhaps discuss the career of Kerry with TFK.

        You people are like insects and you interest me.

    • August 7, 2010 at 7:19 am | #180

      SanFranciscoZionist nobody has a right to build any where. It will not be a triumph for American liberty but a slap in the face of 3,000 people murdeerd in the name of an Imperialist death cult.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 8:07 am | #181

        I’m not SFZ either. But in response to moon dog who asked why sane people abhor Palin. I realize you are having a go at me, but please be a little serious. The woman is a anti-American, anti-Constitutional, craven, self serving, opportunistic hack with the IQ of a pimple.

        I would wager that she couldn’t find Italy on a map.

        She denies evolution.

        She denies that global warming is real.

        Then again you lot do to… I suppose you are having issues still with accepting that Newtonian orbits are real.

        Palin would make America into a laughing stock, crash the economy (to do economics, one must be capable of doing sums and all that) likely start an unnecessary war or two and set civil rights back by four decades. Other than that though I suppose she is amusing as an example of a Christian fanatical zealot with a speech impediment.

      • August 7, 2010 at 11:10 am | #182

        “Palin would make America into a laughing stock, crash the economy ”

        Like your hero Barack Hussein Obama?

      • KGB
        August 7, 2010 at 11:23 am | #183

        “a Anti-American hack”? Nice grammar, professor.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 11:28 am | #184

        actually, the President has turned that desperate job loss under Bush around.

        The numbers don’t lie. Only someone with real math problems could think that the GOP has been good for the economy.

        Since you know history and all, what are your thoughts on cap and trade?

        That was Reagan’s idea you know to deal with acid rain.

        McCain and Palin ran on it before they decided it was cap and tax…

        How do you let them bash on Reagan like that?

    • NoMo
      August 7, 2010 at 8:51 am | #185

      The Constitution you profess to love and revere is not a suicide bomber pact,get it? It does not require me to coexist with,tolerate,or love my enemy. How delicious that an lgf operative is “concerned” with religious freedom, the expression of which resulted in so many being permanently exiled from the cult.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:00 am | #186

        So you claim that the American Muslims who are citizens of this nation and legally posses the land they are building on are suicide bombers?

        Is that actually what you are saying?

  24. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 1:07 am | #187

    Well Sarah, you got us. It is late, I can’t hang, you are just too well versed in your debating skills. Excuse me, skillz.

    Give everyone my love.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 1:12 am | #188

      So your final answer is that you have no answer. OK. That is called you lose.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:13 am | #189

        I’ve answered you. You lose because you support Islamic Colonialism all in the name of tolerance. Well the era of tolerance is over, now we will resist you band your allies. Time is on our side, not yours.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:15 am | #190

        How is it colonialism? You have only claimed it is? How is it so? Do you really think that this mosque means that Hamas will be marching down main street sometime soon? If you do believe that, how will that happen?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:32 am | #191

        “Do you really think that this mosque means that Hamas will be marching down main street sometime soon? If you do believe that, how will that happen?”

        Regardless of the motives of Imam Rauf, the building of a mosque will be perceived by mujahedin the world over, whether in Gaza or Kashmir or Kosovo or Pattani or Mindanao or Sudan or Rohingiya or Xinjiang or Kampong Cham Provice or Bosnia or Chechnya, as a victory over the forces of taghut (“Satanism”, i.e. rejection of Shari’a). Do we want this?

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:18 am | #192

      It them coming here and saying we plant this place as a victory symbol. NY has been Islamicized over the last 9 years and this is another way for them to say, this is a colony.

      There are plenty of Mosques in NY, why they need more. It’s an Imperialist symbol and many don’t support it.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:20 am | #193

        So if NY has been Islamicized, there are a lot of Muslims living there… OK, so those people no doubt support having a house of worship….

        Don’t worry, it will be a long time before they out number Jewish people, Irish, Italians, Hispanics and Black people.

      • Formercorpsman
        August 7, 2010 at 1:24 am | #194

        Methinks.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:25 am | #195

        They have more political power than the original residents. NY use to have Kosher Hot Dogs, then the Muzzies came. They organized and with assistance of the NY City government, they pushed out the other vendors.

        Read about the Halal mafia. It’s people like you helping them.

        You are in the minority, the majority of New Yorkers are against this abomination.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:27 am | #196

        Are you honestly claiming that you can no longer get a kosher hot dog in NY? Are you perhaps claiming that the Muslims are pushing for pork hot dogs?

        You really are drunk aren’t you.

  25. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 1:19 am | #198

    C’mon guys, your debate skills are really pathetic. You claim it is colonialism and conquest… OK then explain how it is colonialism and conquest. How are we being colonized and conquered by a small minority who are building one house of worship?

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:23 am | #199

      It’s a symbol that they are here to rule. Then the useful idiots like you encourage this. You assist them by protecting them and shielding them from criticism. You teach their version of history and not historical facts. Any other religion other than Islam you are OK with to bash. You are a supporter and enabler.

      Read history then com talk with me.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 1:25 am | #200

      Exactly what version of history did I teach that was “theirs?” That will be rich.

      So Cordoba was not a formerly Muslim city… Is that what you are fixating on. If it was Muslim for 500 years, but it isn’t now, it is formerly Muslim.

      How is that not so? Are you drunk, retarded or is English just not your first language?

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:27 am | #201

        ‘So Cordoba was not a formerly Muslim city… Is that what you are fixating on. If it was Muslim for 500 years, but it isn’t now, it is formerly Muslim.’

        It’s a Latin city that was occupied by Arabs for 500 years.

        It was Latin from 200 BC to 700′s BC. Then Latin again 1200′s to now.

        It’s ours deal with it.

        What’s wrong can’t except the fact us Hispanics can build cities?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:28 am | #202

        The concept of dar al-ghasab (usurped land) and jihad ad-daf’ (jihad to regain lands lost to the kuffar) inspires mujahedin to reconquer and re-Islamize al-Andalus (which, at its height, consisted of all of the Iberian Peninsula save the Basque lands, southwestern France, a fortress at the Gulf of Saint Tropez and surrounding land in southeastern France, the Balearic Islands, Corsica, and a fortress on the Garigliano in central Italy).

        Not all Muslims desire this, but some do…

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:29 am | #203

        “How is that not so? Are you drunk, retarded or is English just not your first language?”

        AH so your racism shows. Let me guess I’m Hispanic so I can’t speak English.

        You have no grounds then to call anyone a bigot, when you are borderline Klansman.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:32 am | #204

        What’s wrong can’t except the fact us Hispanics can build cities?

        Do you mean accept? And the Gauls, Celts and Greeks who were there in pre roman times were not Hispanics.

        Care to explain how those people suddenly became Roman?

        And since when have Romans been Hispanic? No one considers Romans Hispanic. If Hispanics are Romans than so are the French, the Greeks, the Albanians, the Moroccans and the Egyptians and the Jews.

        You really are stupid you know.

        Just being conquered by Rome does not make you Hispanic.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:33 am | #205

        I suppose by your reasoning the Hispanics are English since they had their asses handed to them by Britain so many times.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:36 am | #206

        You ignorance is showing. Read about the Hispano Romans.

        Also Hispanics are Latins. The original Latins were the Romans.

        Trajan the greatest Emperor was a Spaniards, as was Marcus Aurelius and Theodosius.

        I know my history and if you want to go there, I’m game.

        You ignorance is showing.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:38 am | #207

        Just being conquered by Rome does not make you Hispanic.

        Doesn’t work like that fool. Hispanics and Italians are the direct descendants of Romans. You can deny this in your prejudice mind all you want but it’s the truth. As for those others people, they weren’t hence that’s why their cultures are distinct from the Romans.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:48 am | #208

        So then why is French a romance language, and what about Romania?

        As to the Spanish being direct descendants of the Romans, you have got to be kidding. They are a mix of all sort of things – including Arabs. If you are of Spanish descent you almost certainly have some Arab in you. Not that such things should make a difference, but your history is just off.

    • Philip_Daniel
      August 7, 2010 at 1:26 am | #209

      Some moderate Muslims oppose this particular mosque…

      http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/4225.htm

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:34 am | #210

        OK, and some are for it. Either way, it is their right to build it. That pesky constitution and all.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:37 am | #211

        Yes, it is their god-given right. However, the First Amendment guarantees individuals to express opposition to such a venture. As for me, I am ambiguous. I really don’t care, as there are larger problems concerning jihad al-talab wa’l-ibtida (offensive jihad initiated by mu’minin ["true believers"])…

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:40 am | #212

        “Either way, it is their right to build it. ”

        It’s our right to oppose it!

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:43 am | #213

      You mean the Spencer Ackerman school of debating?

      If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us. Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists. Ask: why do they have such a deep-seated problem with a black politician who unites the country? What lurks behind those problems? This makes *them* sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction.

      Oh lookie- there’s a plate glass window that’s largely intact because despite your superior intellectual prowess, you somehow failed to ju-jitsu me through it.

      Can’t speak for others, but I for one never said they didn’t have a right to build a mosque Islamic cultural center out of the former Burlington Coat Factory building. But if the backers of the project still want to go through with it after it’s been calmly and rationally explained to them that setting up a mosque or cultural center kitty-corner to Ground Zero could be seen as a slap in the face and a perverse touchdown dance to the loved ones of those who were murdered that day by 19 of the Cordoba/Park51′s co-religionists (and if you intellectually dishonest hacks get to use the broad Scott Roeder brush on Christians and pro-lifers, then I think that’s a fair yardstick to use for the would-be imams and financiers of this mosque), then the reallty is simply that there’s no further point in discussing this with you.

      We’re not going to change your mind, and your condescending platitudes and bogus why-do-you-hate-America strawmen sure as hell aren’t going to convince us.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:53 am | #214

        It’s not a strawman. Either you believe in American values like freedom of religion or you don’t. You clearly don’t.

    • Philip_Daniel
      August 7, 2010 at 1:52 am | #215

      “So then why is French a romance language, and what about Romania?”

      Traditionally, French are considered Gallic i.e. Celtic although they speak a Romance language. Same with the Swiss, who today speak Romansh, French, German, and Italian although they are descended from the Celtic Helvetii people. Belgians are Gallic too; they speak Walloon, a Romance language, though they are descended from the Celtic Belgae. Romanians are considered Latins, however, just as Spanish, Portuguese, Italians and closely-related groups are because they share a common culture.

    • grimcargo
      August 7, 2010 at 7:05 pm | #216

      Stray from Bloated Bovine pos blog. The people who outnumber you do not want this mosque built. The people who outnumber you will put you back where you belong next election. People like you are dangerous to the well being of democracy and to homeland security. But you are outnumbered which is why you spout frantic bs.

  26. Philip_Daniel
    August 7, 2010 at 1:35 am | #217

    Sarahlover –

    How is it that suddenly the inhabitants of the Levant and Mesopotamia and Egypt and Maghreb became Arabs after being conquered in the 7th century, when before they had been Arameans and Assyrians and Chaldeans and Armenians and Kurds and Persians and Jews and Greeks?

    • August 7, 2010 at 4:21 am | #218

      *crickets*

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:53 am | #219

        Well Iran is still Persian and they have a lot of Mongolian in them. As to the rest, the different groups moved in and through and intermingled. Do you have any thoughts of your own, or is this your idea of debate?

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:59 pm | #220

        Nice dodge, Cato. Answer a question with a question.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 4:52 am | #221

      Well Iran is still Persian and they have a lot of Mongolian in them. As to the rest, the different groups moved in and through and intermingled.

      • August 7, 2010 at 10:00 pm | #222

        Why are you so focused on geneological ancestry? Sounds like raaaaacism.

  27. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 1:37 am | #223

    Well it’s been fun kids. For the record, you are just as ignorant, hateful and delusional as claimed. You really do sound like Sarah Palin and Beck. Trust me, for anyone who got above a C average in high-school, that is not a compliment.

    • Philip_Daniel
      August 7, 2010 at 1:38 am | #224

      Do you understand anything I write? Or do I use too many words of Classical Arabic origin?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:45 am | #225

        So the gist of what you are saying is that if they build this mosque, then if they lose it, Muslim armies will invade NY to take it over?

        If they can’t defeat Israel, they will have a much harder time with the US. Come to think of it the US navy… How will they get here?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:54 am | #226

        “So the gist of what you are saying is that if they build this mosque, then if they lose it, Muslim armies will invade NY to take it over?”

        Not quite. But it will be a SYMBOL of defeat, and such symbols have great meaning for people bent on global hegemony such as the extremists.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:57 am | #227

        It will also be a symbol that America values religious freedom and lives up to her ideals as a beacon of freedom in the world. I call that America winning and a symbol of our superiority over the extremists.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:00 am | #228

        Like I said, I do not oppose it, but I can understand those who do, and I don’t engage in vicious ad hominem attacks against them behind the anonymity and security of my computer…

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:39 am | #229

      You’ve been exposed as an Islamic enabler and a Anti-Hispanic bigot. You are the racist and an ass kisser of Arabs.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:46 am | #230

        You are part arab? How does that work?

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:48 am | #231

        You racism shows again. Lebanese Maronites aren’t Arabs. Read up some history before you make assumptions.

        Maronites hate Arabs.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:50 am | #232

        You are Latin no? Let me tell you, it is almost statistically impossible for someone with Spanish lineage to not have an Arab or four in the wood pile.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:55 am | #233

        “You are Latin no? Let me tell you, it is almost statistically impossible for someone with Spanish lineage to not have an Arab or four in the wood pile.”

        Another lie!

        Read this and weep!

        A wide ranging study (published 2007) using 6,501 unrelated Y-chromosome samples from 81 populations found that: “Considering both these E-M78 sub-haplogroups (E-V12, E-V22, E-V65) and the E-M81 haplogroup, the contribution of northern African lineages to the entire male gene pool of Iberia is 5.6%.”

        According to some studies, the North African and Arab element in modern day Iberian ancestry is exceedingly trivial when compared to the pre-Islamic ancestral basis, and the Gibraltar Strait seems to have functioned much more as a genetic barrier than a bridge.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_people#Middle-Eastern_genetic_markers_in_Iberia

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:56 am | #234

        Sarahlover — Ethnicity, unlike race, is not genetic. There are Hungarians with great amounts of Celtic, Illyrian, German, Latin, and Slavic blood, but they nevertheless identify solely as Finno-Ugric.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 1:59 am | #235

        For someone who isn’t a racist, Daedalus, you sure are obsessed with blood lines aren’t you? I know of some other fascists how were similarly obsessed. But calling you a Nazi would not be fair. Real Nazis were scary, disciplined and well organized. You are just a hateful racist punk with delusions of grandeur and a drinking problem.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:01 am | #236

        “For someone who isn’t a racist, Daedalus, you sure are obsessed with blood lines aren’t you?”

        He’s not obsessed with blood-lines since Latin is not a bloodline but a “super-culture” like Arab or Anglo-Saxon…

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:05 am | #237

        “You are just a hateful racist punk with delusions of grandeur and a drinking problem.”

        Ad-hominem attacks are indicative of a lack of reasoning ability.

    • August 7, 2010 at 1:47 am | #238

      OMG!!! YoU WoNZ !!!

      Oh…..if only there was a blog of like-minded people for you to slink back to and tell everyone how awesome you were in taking on those insufferable wingnuts on your own!!!!

      *wistful sigh*
      Indeed….if only there was such a place….

    • grimcargo
      August 7, 2010 at 7:06 pm | #239

      Sarah Palin is a millionaire. Glenn Beck is a millionaire. What are you?

  28. August 7, 2010 at 1:49 am | #240

    Holy fucking shit…..weren’t you leaving already to go brag about your awesomeness elsewhere? Or are you being dishonest about that as well, Ludwig…..?

    Fucking Cat0 the elder is more effective at leaving than you are.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 1:51 am | #241

      Sorry, not Ludwig. I admit, I have read a lot at LGF – enough to know that there is no way Ludwig would debate you lot on Sabbath. But keep trying. Really it’s fun.

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:54 am | #242

        Izzat so, Two Cats Fucking?

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:56 am | #243

        Hi Cato, no need to stop the act.

        Ip’s don’t lie.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:00 am | #244

        Not Cato either. Honest. You have two strikes.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:07 am | #245

        Two cats fucking? That is creative. Whom do you mean by that?

      • August 7, 2010 at 4:26 am | #246

        Cato doesn’t know the proper use of the word “whom” either…

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:39 am | #247

        Well dear me… I’ll go look up my grammar. But in the mean time, how about you address the questions posed you. You are after all quite like described, a miserable gamma amongst betas.

      • August 7, 2010 at 10:02 pm | #248

        You haven’t asked me one question yet.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 1:55 am | #249

      When will you have an actual reply to the whole why do you oppose the fair application of the first amendment question?

      And how can anyone who claims to be a patriot be opposed to it?

      • August 7, 2010 at 1:57 am | #250

        “And how can anyone who claims to be a patriot be opposed to it?”

        We have aright to oppose it.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:58 am | #251

        I don’t oppose the mosque being built, but do I need to repeat why it will embolden mujahedin? (though, because of their weakness, they may never conquer us — Pattani and Chechnya and Rohingiya and East Timor and Uganda are all another thing entirely — they’ll certainly continue to inflict widespread carnage).

      • August 7, 2010 at 2:03 am | #252

        Indeed….how can any red-blooded American be opposed to what amounts to an Islamist touchdown dance adjacent to ground zero? Heck- let’s go one step further and build a mosque Islamic cultural center adjacent to the Pentagon and another next to a vacant field in Pennsylvania.

        It’s been explained to the backers of Park51/Cordoba as to why it could be seen by many New Yorkers as a bad idea, yet they persist. That alone tells me there’s more to it than outreach and freedom of religion….

        Of course, you’re aware of that as well.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:04 am | #253

        OK, To drunken Daedalus, I get that you oppose the mosque – and it is even your right to say so. The constitution protects anti-American speech.

        However, you have yet to give a cogent reason why you oppose it other than sheer hatred and paranoid fantasies about kosher hotdogs.

        And Phillip, if you don’t oppose the mosque being built, then why are you arguing. As to emboldening the Mujahadeen, that’s a silly thing to say. Those monsters hate us as much as possible already.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:11 am | #254

        “Those monsters hate us as much as possible already.”

        Correct. This hatred is based in the dogma of al-wala’a wa’l-bara’a, loyalty and enmity, and will exist regardless of any other phenomena.

        “As to emboldening the Mujahadeen, that’s a silly thing to say.”

        By embolden, I mean it will encourage them in their war of conquest and Islamization.

        Either way, actually, they can utilize this to their advantage, whether it is banned or not. If banned, then they will claim it as a “grievance”. If it is built, then they will celebrate its construction at the site of the “Manhattan Ghazw” as a sign of Allah’s favor for al-mu’minin and as an indicator of the transformation of kaffir lands into those of the Muslims.

  29. Kos Laughs At Chuckles
    August 7, 2010 at 2:05 am | #255

    Well, since there are only three loozards allowed to attack other sites under their own names (KKKilgore, Reggie, and spacejesus), this smells of one of the suckups who are trying to win updings but afraid of being caught over here.

    Fran (Reine) the failed cookbook designer, is that you?

    Also, what other sites are attacking Chuckles besides this one? Check Ace, HotAir, GatewayPundit. Are any of them talking about Charles’s alleged hate mail?

  30. Kos Laughs At Chuckles
    August 7, 2010 at 2:06 am | #256

    sarahlover:
    You just called Daedalus a drunk. That’s one of the old insults Reggie likes to use. Obviously, you are a lizard afraid of coming out

  31. Kos Laughs At Chuckles
    August 7, 2010 at 2:11 am | #257

    WOW. Sarahlover (a lizard undercover) attacks, somebody sendt by Chuckles to send out nasty emails to W-Zippers, and Charles claiming he is getting graphic emails?

    He definitely is tryingto start another blog war to get attention. But too bad, fatass. Kos still won’t take you, and none of the big righty bloggers will even bother to punch down to your diminished level to grant you that attention you want.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 2:19 am | #258

      A little paranoid are you? I promise that no one sent me. I came here of my own free will to see if you people were as moronic, hateful, ignorant and just plain stupid as LvQ claimed you are. I now know he was not even close to exaggerating.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:22 am | #259

        I have no doubt you did. On the bigotry and stupidity scales, do I resemble the rest, or am I just a bit better?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:29 am | #260

        Actually a lot better. I strongly disagree with you, but you are not a total moron.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:34 am | #261

        “I strongly disagree with you”

        On what? The fact that mujahedin are following ‘usul al-fiqh to the letter? That moderate Muslims are munafiqin who would be the first to die if mujahedin invaded?

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 2:51 am | #262

        I forgot to reveal I’m only 20 :D

  32. August 7, 2010 at 2:23 am | #263

    I promise that no one sent me. I came here of my own free will I begged and pleaded with Charles to come over here and defend my good name without him banning me.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 2:32 am | #264

      No really Fenway. I am not Ludwig. I am sure he is enjoying Shabbos with his girl. I am even more certain that he has never come here to deal with you wankers because he has better things to do. I should have had better things to do tonight myself.

      Well it was a little fun – kind of like going to a zoo.

      I decided I wanted to find out if what he and others said about you fools was true.

      It obviously was.

      • grimcargo
        August 7, 2010 at 7:10 pm | #265

        If lud has a girl which I doubt. He would be worn out because he has to walk too far to kiss her.

  33. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 2:28 am | #266

    OK now I am out… You little howler monkeys can feel free to fling poo all you like. I know you will anyway at your little stalker club.

    For the record, not a single one of you addressed the main issue of constitutional liberties or American values. Though I will give Phillip credit for at least trying to make a point here and there. To him I say holding up American liberty and values is a greater an more important symbol not only to us, but world wide. Things like this are what makes us great. They do not weaken us.

    The rest of you are utterly pathetic, hate filled morons. It was obvious that you deserved your bannings.

    • August 7, 2010 at 2:32 am | #267

      Oh noes! Don’t leave…..//

      Tell us how you feel about a civilian trial in mid-town Manhattan for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (again!)….

      And don’t bother going through my posts with a fine toothed-comb to try and see exactly where I said I was against the Bill of Rights or freedom of religion, you phony patriot.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:34 am | #268

        What does this have to do with KSM?

        OK that interests me? How is he at all related to this?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:35 am | #269

        And why am I letting myself get sucked into this?

      • August 7, 2010 at 2:44 am | #270

        Whoa there…..weren’t you going back to hang out with all the ‘cool kids’?

        Far be it from me to get in your way……..of course you must be dilligently going through all my posts where I called for the use of the US Constitution as toilet paper and declaring all five bouroughs of NYC as a ‘Muslim-free zone’….

        There’s just so many of them to sort through, I’m sure…

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 2:48 am | #271

        I am not going through all of your posts. You want to deny other Americans their constitutional rights in a most un-American way. Why do I need to go through your posts when your hatred of Americanism is already obvious.

        And what does a KSM trial have to do with this? Is this another conspiracy theory? Please do enlighten me?

  34. August 7, 2010 at 2:52 am | #272

    I am not going through all of your posts. You want to deny other Americans their constitutional rights in a most un-American way. Why do I need to go through your posts when your hatred of Americanism is already obvious.

    Translation: Why should I bother going through your comments to try and find something that you never said when I can just use strawmen and arbitrarily put words in your mouth.

    DEBATE FAIL

    Bye now…..I’m done with your useless ass.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 3:00 am | #273

      What? The people building the mosque have every right to do so. You would deny them that right. Correct?

      It follows that you are denying basic American liberties to other Americans.

      Now what is this deal with KSM?

      Seriously.. I want to hear it. It’s got to be a doosy. Please… It’s late and I could use a good grassy knoll like KSM and the mosque story.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 3:15 am | #274

      Ohh are you one of those ones who thinks you will post last and then having made the last post see it as some sort of “victory” when you haven’t said a single thing of substance? Is your life that empty Fenway? Trust me, no real American service man is that pathetic. You never served a day in your life.

  35. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 3:26 am | #275

    One last thought… Many Americans fully understand just how sick and crazy you teabaggers are.

    You will fortunately lose even more seats in November. Try stopping absolutely everything, even your own stuff (like how Cap and Trade was a McCain Palin ticket item – and as an idea it came from Reagan with acid rain) when you have less than 40 senators.

    You are just too crazy and there simply aren’t enough Americans as stupid and crazy as you to carry your little teabag candidates into office in a national contest.

    It will be nice to see your jingoistic, hate filled, plutocratic, corporate kleptocratic little party of ignorant, racist anti-science douchebags get sacked.

    Obama will get another 4 years because you lot will run a moron like Palin who can’t tie a pair of shoes without photographic instructions.

    Then some real progress can happen in America.

    • August 7, 2010 at 4:46 am | #276

      What a pleasant ignorant biased troll we have here. I wonder what it’s like to live with such bottled up hatred. Can’t discuss anything without hurling insults, even when its questions are answered several times over. At the same time, it produces no facts to back up its accusations because there are none. Lastly, the pissant goes full bore with a wild off-topic keyboard ejaculation hoping that it’s got the last word in.

      Looking forward to 8th grade, troll?.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 4:50 am | #277

        Excuse me? Project much? The question is simple and well put.

        How can you claim to be a patriotic American while denying basic American rights and liberties to other Americans?

        Why don’t you answer in your own words?

        As to bias, yes, I confess, I am very biased against ignorant hateful and stupid little pissant wankers like you.

      • August 7, 2010 at 10:06 pm | #278

        “How can you claim to be a patriotic American while denying basic American rights and liberties to other Americans?”

        I don’t deny anyone their rights because it’s not in my power to do so. Next question.

    • African Moondog
      August 7, 2010 at 5:51 am | #279

      “It will be nice to see your jingoistic, hate filled, plutocratic, corporate kleptocratic little party of ignorant, racist anti-science douchebags get sacked. ”

      You are taIking about the Democrats, right?

      BTW, the moment the word “racist” is used in a debate, it is an admission of defeat on the part of the user.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:53 am | #280

        Ohh are you going to deny that the GOP is racist… You do realize your boy Rodan routinely calls for the genocide of all Muslims…

        That would be a short debate if you tried it.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 1:37 pm | #281

        Sarah, Islam is not a race or an ethnic group — look, there are blonde Muslims in the Balkans, Caucasus, Crimea, Anatolia, Uralic provinces of Russia, and Baltic states — although they generally claim to be one Ummah (i.e., nation). Rodan needs to cease conflating the orthodox dogma with all its reprehensible attributes with the people, many of whom do not adhere to the dogma (and are thenceforth considered suitable victims by the mujahedin)…

        I am an independent. Frankly, I could never join the Democratic party because of its history…

    • Philip_Daniel
      August 7, 2010 at 1:45 pm | #282

      ‘teabaggers”

      I am not affiliated with the T[axed]E[nough]A[lready] Party movement (which is not a political party, but a grassroots movement). To call them teabaggers reeks of homophobia, although I presume that is not your intention (the Right is often slandered as homophobic [by the way, Fred Phelps and his clan are registered Democrats], and homophobia is perceived by many as a method used by those uncomfortable with their actual homosexuality by obfuscating it through “bigotry”).

      “jingoistic”

      Self-defense against murabitun such as al-Qaeda and dawlat such as the Taliban is now equated with jingoism? Removing a dictator who gassed 182,000 Kurds to death between 1986-89 (Anfal campaign) is jingoism?

      “anti-science”

      I’m a Darwinist.

      “Obama will get another 4 years because you lot will run a moron like Palin who can’t tie a pair of shoes without photographic instructions.”

      Obama is intelligent, but terribly naive and ineffectual like Buchanan…

  36. nil stooge
    August 7, 2010 at 7:27 am | #283

    Wow, the more LVQ writes the dumber he comes across. And Sarahlover comes across even dumber. My latest theory – cf. AxeCop – is that a couple of years ago Charles got splashed with some lobster blood Dummie Underground HTML and transmogrified. It’s all DU all the time over there these days. Ugh.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 7:54 am | #284

      Really, he tore all of you silly twits a new arse hole now didn’t he?

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 8:00 am | #285

      You’re the creepy statistician of the lot right?

      You do know that you aren’t very bright right?

      • nil stooge
        August 7, 2010 at 8:20 am | #286

        DU’h

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 8:23 am | #287

        Well that’s more like it.

  37. Sarahlover
    August 7, 2010 at 8:10 am | #288

    Where is Princess Natasha? I will enjoy hearing from her foul mouth.

  38. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 8:43 am | #289

    You know for someone claiming to be leaving, they sure can’t find the door. Quite frankly I don’t give a shit what you think about me. People like you are what’s wrong with this country.

    Now kindly commence to fucking off.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 8:47 am | #290

      Wait, what happened to being welcoming to all views…

      My views are that first amendment rights are a cornerstone of America and part of what makes her great. You lot are the ones who think that they only apply some of the time.

      If anyone is what is wrong with America its racist little twits like you. You are after-all content to tear down her foundations because the terrorists cause you to wet yourself so. That is called being a coward.

      Brave Americans believe that they can keep their principles and still prevail. It’s the scared little creeps like you who would tear it down.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 8:51 am | #291

        Dance my troll, dance lol

        La la la

        Americans have the right to oppose.

        Note the bare minimum it takes to keep it going.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 8:54 am | #292

        Oh you can call me racist all you want. That’s the typical go to play out of the liberal troll playbook.

        Whether or not you think I am racist doesn’t mean jack shit sister.

        Now dance.

  39. Horatio
    August 7, 2010 at 8:45 am | #293

    Sarahlover said–>”Why are you opposed to granting basic American rights and liberties to some, but not others?”

    Ask that question when you explicitly state in this forum that you are in favor of abolishing affirmative action or any other government enforced program that favors one group of Americans over another. Because until you do that, you have effectively stated that “All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.” As long as you hold that position, your ramblings about “equal Constitutional protections” are hypocritical.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 8:50 am | #294

      Well affirmative actin was created to redress the horrid inequalities of slavery now wasn’t it? So long as prejudiced whites like you have a say in hiring, it will be needed – or bigots like you will keep some more equal than others.

      Isn’t that the whole point of telling the Muslims they can’t build a mosque after all?

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 8:53 am | #295

        *Tugs on troll leash*

        They can’t build two blocks away from ground zero without looking like assholes. End of story.

      • Horatio
        August 7, 2010 at 9:11 am | #296

        How do you know I’m white or even in a position to keep some folks more equal than others? Only government can do that.

        You obviously don’t believe in private property or individual liberty because if you did then you would understand that the right to be a bigot is fundamental to a free society. If I want to operate a restaurant that excludes Jews, melanin-enhaced individuals, left-handed lesbians, or midgets with warts, then my right to have one being trumped by the government telling me that under the potential of a law enforcement officer killing me if I resist to aggressively, is anathema to a free society.

        If a member of one of those “groups” I may not want in my restaurant, opens one next door to mine and wants to deny me and my fellow “bigots” from patronizing his rdtablishment, I’d support them wholeheartedly.

        When the government is used to promote one group over another -that is tyranny. When individual do it, it’s liberty.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:16 am | #297

        The right of a bigot is fundamental to a free society? Did I honestly just read that? Really? Wow.

        The right of ignorant and backwards white trash like you is to be grateful that better men died to give you your freedoms and to never take them for granted.

      • Horatio
        August 7, 2010 at 9:31 am | #298

        “The right of a bigot is fundamental to a free society? Did I honestly just read that?”

        Yes, you read that correctly. The fact that you’re amazed is typical of those who believe in government imposed equality where some are more equal than others.

        You also don’t understand the promotion of individual liberty as versus the promotion of bigotry.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:33 am | #299

        No I don’t understand the myriad ways that little racist assholes like you can rationalize their malice.

      • KGB
        August 7, 2010 at 11:35 am | #300

        The right of a bigot is fundamental to a free society? Did I honestly just read that? Really? Wow.

        Isn’t that what your entire hissy fit has been about, Two Cats Fucking?

    • Horatio
      August 7, 2010 at 9:39 am | #301

      OK – so now you’re into throwing around epithets, rather than discussing the merits of an argument – doing exactly what you accuse others here of doing.

  40. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 8:50 am | #302

    You know what’s really funny about this? The troll has become the trolled. He/she/it cannot help but reply. That’s when you have your prey hooked. Especially when there’s about 10 mentions of “goodbye now” folllowed by a reply.

    The troll has become the trolled. LOL

    There is no willpower to ignore any reply or comment directed at them … so the hunter has become the hunted.

    What a moron. Dance, troll, dance! LOL

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 8:56 am | #303

      Or, I am amused by all of your pathetic attempts to sound clever. You do realize that with one exception, not a single one of you has said a single cogent thing?

      I imagine how very threatening it is to your little bubble to have someone to not only disagree with you, but find you repulsive for your hateful anti-American and uncivilized ignorant views. I can see this will drive you into a desperate bid of any kind to reassert some illusion of control.

      But the reality is that none of you are very bright, you are all very scared little people and you band together for mutual reassurance. Little pissants the lot of you really. Ohhh the big bad Muslims will build a mosque… Socialists everywhere! Communists stealing your dental floss and snogging your girl…

      However do you survive in a world with so much to wet yourselves over?

      Honestly, you continue to amuse little man. This started out as a sort of id to sate some curiosity, but now I realize how much I utterly detest ignorant, uneducated and worthless trailer trash like you.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 8:57 am | #304

        HA HA HA HA

        I am trolling you

        Dance troll, dance …

        You are the problem with America.

      • grimcargo
        August 7, 2010 at 7:18 pm | #305

        One thing I know for sure. The likes of you from beginning of time never put themselves on the line to preserve anything. Only hid behind others and gave rants and speeches. If depending on cowards like you. we would still be kissing the Queen’s ass. Why don’t you do the world a favor and cut out your tongue. We outnumber you. You who seems to apologize for being white.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:37 pm | #306

        I’m not apologizing for being white one bit. That is a curious bit of projection from you.

        I am appalled by ignorance though.

      • August 7, 2010 at 10:15 pm | #307

        “You do realize that with one exception, not a single one of you has said a single cogent thing?”

        The incognoscenti is not capable of judging the cognoscenti. Meh.

  41. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 8:56 am | #308

    … and the beauty of it this is that he/she/it can’t reply without proving my point. LMAO!

    Troll-b-gone

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 8:58 am | #309

      And so can’t you. Not a win for you there little creature.

      So why don’t you tell me, because I have been asking this all this time and waiting for something cogent.

      How can a brave patriot like yourself (snicker) not believe int he importance of the first amendment?

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:03 am | #310

        No sister, I started it. Sorry, it doesn’t work like that. You’re the one claiming to be leaving 10 different times only to prove that you can’t.

        The hilarious thing as I that I am explicitly telling you you’re being trolled but you’re too god damn stupid to stop replying.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:06 am | #311

        How can a brave patriot like yourself (snicker) not believe in the importance of the first amendment?

        I realize that much like a dog chasing its tail you will go on about who you think is in control of this exchange, but any neutral observer will see you dodging the obvious question.

        You really are a scared little man aren’t you?

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:08 am | #312

        OMG keep those replies going. LMAO

        Dance troll. Dance.

  42. NoMo
    August 7, 2010 at 8:59 am | #313

    Hey Lewdie,didn’t get the message that “Human Rights” and “Social Justice” are scams perpetrated on the willfully ignorant by tyrants and militant atheists?

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:05 am | #314

      Well, for the dozenth time, I am not Ludwig. He would not waste his time actually talking to cretins like you. He does however seem to enjoy looking at your antics and commenting on them.

      As to social justice, I suppose you think that Jesus then was an atheist tyrant. He sure spent a large part of his mission talking about people being just to other people for change.

      And according to every Jewish friend I have, that seems to have been the prophetic tradition in those parts since there were Jews.

      I suppose this means that you are neither Christian nor Jewish? Curious then because you also seem to hate Islam and atheists – so may I conclude that you worship Satan?

      • NoMo
        August 7, 2010 at 9:30 am | #315

        My aren’t you full of yourself? fyi I was addressing THE Ludwig,you know,the topic of this thread.

        Why thank you for outing yourself by invoking the great imitator,the counterfeiter of truth.The one deity the left clings bitterly to.

        John 8:44

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:32 am | #316

        So you do worship Satan. I am glad that is all cleared up.

        Provided you do so lawfully (no blood sacrifices there mate) the first amendment protects you.

      • Philip_Daniel
        August 7, 2010 at 7:30 pm | #317

        Sarahlover, he was disavowing Satan, as John 8:44 says…

        “You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 7:39 pm | #318

        So in other words by rejecting the goodness and decency f a Christ like life, he has turned to Satan and become self righteous about it as well.

  43. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 9:06 am | #319

    I love it when the peanut garden gets pissed.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:09 am | #320

      but I am not angry, only bemused, repulsed and strangely curious. I find interacting with you akin to picking up a rock and discovering a particularly odious yet vividly green slime.

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:11 am | #321

        You felt the need to come over here but needed the permission of The Corpulent One to do so.

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:12 am | #322

        That green slime is Cato’s jizz as he spanked the monkey to a pohto of Bristol Palin.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:14 am | #323

        Jizz? OK I can accept that you are cato’s jizz…

        But be careful with your language. Guggi is apparently very sensitive to such things. It offends her virgin ears – or so she said.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:16 am | #324

        This is too funny. You’ve been told that I am trolling you … I have no desire to have an actual conversation with you … yet you can’t keep yourself from taking the bait.

        You have to be one of the lamest, dumbest trolls ever because I’ve got you hooked and you can’t stop replying to me. LMAO!

        Trollin trollin trollin … reply!

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:18 am | #325

        But it doesn’t work that way honey. I started this first and you can’t keep from talking to me :)

        I am trolling you. Dance little penis man. Dance.

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:19 am | #326

        You cannot just leave. You love the freedom that is here as opposed to the Blog Version of Animal Farm that is Little Green Balls. What does Chuckles do for a living by the way?

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:20 am | #327

        He cannot dance until he removes said penis from your mouth.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:23 am | #328

        Oh Heracles penis in mouth? Do you talk to your mother with that mouth of yours?

  44. Johnny Molecule
    August 7, 2010 at 9:18 am | #329

    HAHAHAHA holy shit this has been the best read ever.
    I still recall some wanker’s comment on LGF urging his fellow readers that this site wasn’t worth considering because of the LOW COMMENT COUNT!

    Sarahlover, mate it’s been hilarious. The beautiful thing is that you will come back here, read this (out of what must now be sheer impulse), and then drag some more mates with you next time to back you up, thus snowballing the amount of attention this blog is going to get.

    And the crowning fucking thorn in fat-man’s ass is that in this single thread there has been more debate and more attention than his entire blog for years. How hard it must be to baaaa like a sheep and not clomp on the eggshells!

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:21 am | #330

      I don’t think so. You seem, like many here, to have problems doing your sums.

      I’ve been on 1200 comment threads over there. This is still very small potatoes. Also most of the comments are me pointing out why you wankers are wankers.

      • Johnny Molecule
        August 7, 2010 at 9:24 am | #331

        Oh this is beautiful. The follow-up time is so short! Tommorow morning this thread will be what, 500+ 600+ comments?

        Can’t wait to read it all when it unfolds. Isn’t it great when you don’t get banned for disagreement? Each new post here is another stab at the fat man’s ego. Please, please keep it up.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:26 am | #332

        What you mean Charles? Do you really think he regrets driving ignorant twits like you off of his blog? Are you honestly so narcissistic that you think he misses uneducated trash like you? Now that is rich.

      • Johnny Molecule
        August 7, 2010 at 9:30 am | #333

        He wouldn’t miss me, because I never registered. Keep swinging though; I love how you try and paint all the commenters here with the same brush. Pathetic, yes, but hey, at least you haven’t been banned for it!

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:33 am | #334

        By your “logic” McDonalds must be one of the best restaurants on earth: billions and billions served.

        Quantity != Quality

      • August 7, 2010 at 9:39 am | #335

        1200 threads and 3/4 of them were by Sharmuta, iceweasel, jimmah, and Ludqwig VanQuackquack.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:41 am | #336

        I think half this thread is either iceweasel or jimmah

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 9:47 am | #337

        Iceweasle, Jimmah and Ludwig are all so very much smarter than you. How you must hate that.

        Iceweasel and Jimmah clearly have degrees in some sort of philosophy or literature and Ludwig is a real live physicist.

        How does it feel to realize that those who are vastly smarter than you constantly look down on you for being so ignorant and stupid?

        The difference between them and your lot mentally is like the difference between an average person and a cat.

        You must know that somewhere in your gut, and how it must burn to know they never agree with you.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:49 am | #338

        Are you *still* replying to me? LMAO

        Just can’t help trying to go after that cheese! SNAP

      • Heracles
        August 7, 2010 at 10:04 am | #339

        asswhistle is a failed porn actress. Btw what ever happened to Sharmuta?

  45. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 9:19 am | #340

    You replied to me first Sarahlover. And you’ve been replying ever since. ;)

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:22 am | #341

      I was here replying to everyone long before you got here. Do you really think that inane line of talk is anything other than stupid.

      Dance little penis man! Dance for me!

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:27 am | #342

        LOL no matter what I do you reply. *Tugs on string line, reels in slowly*

        Fresh fish!

        I’ve been here since the start iceweasel!

  46. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 9:31 am | #343

    I don’t care what you say at all. I am just trying to see how many replies I can get out of you before you stop. LMAO

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:34 am | #344

      But you aren’t laughing at all because you aren’t impressing anyone and everyone, including you, knows this. I do hope you pass puberty at some point soon so that you grow out of this phase.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 9:37 am | #345

        You really can’t help yourself, can you?

        Obvious troll is obvious.

        I am telling you I am trolling you, yet you don’t have the willpower not to respond. LMAO

        Both pathetic and hilarious at the same time.

        I don’t give a shit about impressing anyone. I’m just seeing how fucking stupid you are to keep replying.

  47. Horatio
    August 7, 2010 at 9:39 am | #346

    From DEEP Inside The Binary Bunker

    The Bill Of No Rights
    by Lewis Napper

    We, the sensible of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid any more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt-ridden delusional, and other liberal, commie, pinko bedwetters.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that a whole lot of people were confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim that they require a Bill of No Rights.

    ARTICLE I
    You do not have the right to a new car, big-screen color TV or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

    ARTICLE II
    You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone — not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc., but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

    ARTICLE III
    You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all of your relatives independently wealthy.

    ARTICLE IV
    You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.

    ARTICLE V
    You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we’re just not interested in public health care.

    ARTICLE VI
    You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim or kill someone, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and kill you.

    ARTICLE VII
    You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won’t have the right to a big-screen color TV or a life of leisure.

    ARTICLE VIII
    You do not have the right to demand that our children risk their lives in foreign wars to soothe your aching conscience. We hate oppressive governments and won’t lift a finger to stop you from going to fight if you’d like. However, we do not enjoy parenting the entire world and do not want to spend so much of our time battling each and every little tyrant with a military uniform and a funny hat.

    ARTICLE IX
    You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have one, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities in education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.

    ARTICLE X
    You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to pursue happiness — which, by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an overabundance of idiotic laws created by those around you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

    Copyright © Lewis W. Napper

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:42 am | #347

      So you really hate Jesus don’t you? As a Christian, I am appalled.

      • Heracles
        August 7, 2010 at 10:02 am | #348

        You are not a Christian, you are a Liberal.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:05 am | #349

        So all that stuff that Jesus said about caring for others, turning the other cheek, rich people having a terrible time getting into heaven because they are so self important – all of those calls he made for kindness, tolerance, civility and love of your fellow – that was not Christian?

        Oh dear.

        I hate to break it to you but your Lord and Saviour was a Liberal too.

      • Heracles
        August 7, 2010 at 10:10 am | #350

        If Jesus was such a Liberal then why do leftist such as Corpulent One hate him so much?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:14 am | #351

        They don’t hate Jesus. They hate closed minded, hateful, ignorant, white trash like you who pretend to speak for him.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 9:51 am | #352

      And are you on the prayer list?

      I wonder what Goddess would think of such unchristian views.

      • Heracles
        August 7, 2010 at 12:02 pm | #353

        Hey Ned time to cleanup Haku’s shit.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 12:04 pm | #354

        Right, it doesn’t bother me much, but I really am not Ned.

  48. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 9:44 am | #355

    ———————————
    ARTICLE II
    You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone — not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc., but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
    ———————————

    This is what makes America great. We don’t protect ourselves from ourselves. Freedom of speech means the freedom to be offended. You can’t have one without the other.

  49. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 10:09 am | #356

    Hey I think the troll finally figured out she was being trolled.Really, really slow on the uptake it seems. I can’t believe someone that stupid is going to come here and try to lecture anyone on anything. Normally people of such marginal intelligence are needed to be looked after and kept away from sharp objects. Too funny.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 10:15 am | #357

      It wold be locked up there sugar :)

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 10:18 am | #358

        LOL just can’t help yourself. Oh how many times will moron reply?

        As sphincter says what?

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:21 am | #359

        a sphincter… dear. “a”

        Are you sure you aren’t replying to me? Dance little penis man dance!

  50. spaceallah
    August 7, 2010 at 10:23 am | #360

    Actually I left off an “s”

    • spaceallah
      August 7, 2010 at 10:27 am | #361

      Oh and your obsession with my penis speaks for itself. Seems there’s two things you can count on today: the sun rising in the east and this dipshit replying to anyone and anything despite being told they are a moron for doing so.

      I’m getting tired of pulling on marionette strings. Apparently you are too stupid to disengage when you’re taking a horrible beating. I have better things to do so I bid you adieu.

      • spaceallah
        August 7, 2010 at 10:28 am | #362

        Oh one more thing: unlike you I actually have the willpower and maturity to stay away. You are a pathetic child. Go fuck yourself and die in a fire.

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:29 am | #363

        Three whole posts to say you can stay away?

        Dance little penis man dance!

      • Sarahlover
        August 7, 2010 at 10:43 am | #364

        And with that, I win.

  51. My Little Ponytail
    August 7, 2010 at 10:57 am | #365

    This has been most ejumucationable. I now know for sure something that I’d only suspected.

    • Sarahlover
      August 7, 2010 at 11:00 am | #366

      Ohh do tell us… Don’t be a tease.

  52. August 7, 2010 at 11:16 am | #367

    Wow, he got 23 clicks on his blog post?

    In the olden days, when a respected commenter over there posted an article or blog post of interest, he could receive hundreds of clicks.

  53. August 7, 2010 at 11:22 am | #368

    Ooh – real live (?) LGFers on here ? Kewl. Would one of y’all get an update from Chaz on The Great Google Boycott and The Digg Wars and report back to us ? I always wondered how those turned out.

    • My Little Ponytail
      August 7, 2010 at 11:40 am | #369

      Google boycott? What did I miss?

      • August 7, 2010 at 11:43 am | #370

        You don’t remember The Great Google Boycott?

        Kids…

  54. midwestgak
    August 7, 2010 at 11:39 am | #371

    Sarahlover has her own thread here now? Just askin’

    • My Little Ponytail
      August 7, 2010 at 11:41 am | #372

      I don’t think it’s a she, but you know, on the internet, nobody knows you’re a blow-up doll…

      • Heracles
        August 7, 2010 at 12:23 pm | #373

        It is Cato the Elder

      • August 7, 2010 at 10:18 pm | #374

        Sister of Cato the Elder. They sleep together.

  55. Guggi
    August 7, 2010 at 1:06 pm | #375

    >>>>”Don’t dare bringing up Auschwitz….etc.”<<<>>>”As far as this prejudiced bitch is concerned”…<<<<

    Boy, you claim to be a scientist with a PhD but I’ve never seen a scientist with such a vulgar and primitive language like you who is permanently attacking his counterparts ad hominem. Apparently your parents didn’t spend much time to educate you and to teach you some manners. The atmosphere of communication in your family must have been…aahh…very uncivilized.

    But now to the points:

    Why don’t you answer my questions ? Remember you were the one who wrote about “only the guilty should be punished”

    ad 1) How do you know who is guilty ?

    ad 2) How do you know who of those who will pray at the Mosque have celebrated 9/11 at home ?

    ad 3) How do you know the motifs*) of those who will pray there ?

    motif = motive and both spellings are correct. Have a look at a good dictionary.

    Is it possible that you have already made the decision “who is guilty” as prosecutor, investigator and judge in one person ?

    I dislike the word “Kollektivschuld” (collective guilt) but there is another term: collective responsibility. You could read about it in essays by Ralph Giordano or Rabbi Leopold Neuhaus (essay about the “Reichskristallnacht” = Night of Broken Glass, 1945). There is a morally collective complicity if people don’t stand up against terrorism or an murderous ideology like Nazism and simply look the other way. Since more than three decades Islam stands for the death of hundreds of thousands of people of all religions killed in terror attacks: Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and of course fellow Muslims.

    Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is no exception because he is NOT condemning terrorism. He refuses to condemn the terror organization Hamas and he is closely affiliated with and financed by a group which was the main donor (US$ 300,000+) to the “Flotilla”-movement. Another case is that he is scanning all nations all over the world how compatible their constitutions are to sharia. Does this ring some bells ? No ?

    With not a single word I denied that there are good Muslim people. I’ve clashed quite often with other members of the blogmocracy about to lump together all Muslims but I’m neither naive nor stupid.

    Let me end with a last sentence: you’re right, I do not grant the same protections of America to Americans ‘I do not like’, because I’m not American. ;-)

    Got it ?

  56. Guggi
    August 7, 2010 at 1:09 pm | #376

    Ooops, most of my posting was eaten……

    I try it again:

    >>>>”Don’t dare bringing up Auschwitz….etc.”<<<>>>”As far as this prejudiced bitch is concerned”…<<<<

    Boy, you claim to be a scientist with a PhD but I’ve never seen a scientist with such a vulgar and primitive language like you who is permanently attacking his counterparts ad hominem. Apparently your parents didn’t spend much time to educate you and to teach you some manners. The atmosphere of communication in your family must have been…aahh…very uncivilized.

    But now to the points:

    Why don’t you answer my questions ? Remember you were the one who wrote about “only the guilty should be punished”

    ad 1) How do you know who is guilty ?

    ad 2) How do you know who of those who will pray at the Mosque have celebrated 9/11 at home ?

    ad 3) How do you know the motifs*) of those who will pray there ?

    motif = motive and both spellings are correct. Have a look at a good dictionary.

    Is it possible that you have already made the decision “who is guilty” as prosecutor, investigator and judge in one person ?

    I dislike the word “Kollektivschuld” (collective guilt) but there is another term: collective responsibility. You could read about it in essays by Ralph Giordano or Rabbi Leopold Neuhaus (essay about the “Reichskristallnacht” = Night of Broken Glass, 1945). There is a morally collective complicity if people don’t stand up against terrorism or an murderous ideology like Nazism and simply look the other way. Since more than three decades Islam stands for the death of hundreds of thousands of people of all religions killed in terror attacks: Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and of course fellow Muslims.

    Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is no exception because he is NOT condemning terrorism. He refuses to condemn the terror organization Hamas and he is closely affiliated with and financed by a group which was the main donor (US$ 300,000+) to the “Flotilla”-movement. Another case is that he is scanning all nations all over the world how compatible their constitutions are to sharia. Does this ring some bells ? No ?

    With not a single word I denied that there are good Muslim people. I’ve clashed quite often with other members of the blogmocracy about to lump together all Muslims but I’m neither naive nor stupid.

    Let me end with a last sentence: you’re right, I do not grant the same protections of America to Americans ‘I do not like’, because I’m not American. ;-)

    Got it ?

  57. Guggi
    August 7, 2010 at 1:10 pm | #377

    ”Don’t dare bringing up Auschwitz….etc.”

    Boy, it looks like you don’t know that much about Auschwitz. Time for you to get some education.

    i) At the very beginning Auschwitz had been a camp for Polish (Catholic) intellectuals and war prisoners from the Soviet Union (SU). This was camp I or “Stammlager”. No Jews involved.

    ii) Even Auschwitz-Birkenau (which became the extermination camp for about 1.1 Mill. Jews) or Camp II was planned as an additional war prisoner-camp. Mostly for war prisoners from the SU.

    iii) Originally both camps were not planned as extermination camps for Jews but as labor camps for war prisoners and Polish freedom fighters.

    iv) At Auschwitz I and II about 400,000 Christians were killed, murdered, annihilated, gazed, tortured or starved to death.

    v) The place where the nuns built their convent was a private property of the Catholic Church of Poland and outside the camp at the border to Auschwitz I “Stammlager” and it was an international center of peace.

    vi) Most of the Christian victims had been murdered at Auschwitz I “Stammlager” where (outsite the camp) the convent was built.

    vii) At the memorial stone is written that the victims were “mostly Jews”. It’s correct, at the end 2.5 times more Jews has been killed at Auschwitz than Christians but don’t you think they (the Christians) had their “fair share” with 400,000 victims too ? Or do you prefer to threw them under the bus ?

    Before you scream at me: no, I’m NOT defending the convent and I agree with one left-wing German newspaper (“taz”) which called it the “Christianization of the Shoa”. Exactly this is what happens at Ground Zero: the “Islamization of 9/11”. To make the religion of the terrorists dominant at Ground Zero with an Islamic Center and a huge Mosque is as tasteless as to build a convent at Auschwitz since most of the Nazis were baptized but not believing Christians.

    What would you tell the mayor of Munich if an Islamic “moderate” group with a close affiliation to Fateh and the PLO would like to build a Mosque in front of the place where 11 Israeli sportsmen and trainers were held captive and murdered in a massacre at the Olympics 1972. Would you oppose the Mosque as inappropriate or would you promote it for religious freedom ?

    What is sickening is your argument that “the ground is to be commercially developed” and about the “building of office buildings”. This could come out directly of the mouth of an al-Kaida member. The towers were attacked explicit because of their commercial importance. Every other use than a commercially one would be a soundly victory for al-Kaida. Btw.: would you make the same argument (about the use) in cause of the Pentagon ? Yes or no ?

    What you apparently can’t manage is to differ between the requests of victims and those who are affiliated with the wrong doers. If the New Yorkers decide to open an amusement park at Ground Zero it would their (the victims) decision although it would be imho inappropriate.
    So, to go back again: it is appropriate to build an 11 story Mosque and Islamic Center near Ground Zero but it is not appropriate to build a convent near Auschwitz where about 400,000 Christians were murdered. Did I get this one right ?

    “As far as this prejudiced bitch is concerned”…

    Boy, you claim to be a scientist with a PhD but I’ve never seen a scientist with such a vulgar and primitive language like you who is permanently attacking his counterparts ad hominem. Apparently your parents didn’t spend much time to educate you and to teach you some manners. The atmosphere of communication in your family must have been…aahh…very uncivilized.

    But now to the points:

    Why don’t you answer my questions ? Remember you were the one who wrote about “only the guilty should be punished”

    ad 1) How do you know who is guilty ?

    ad 2) How do you know who of those who will pray at the Mosque have celebrated 9/11 at home ?

    ad 3) How do you know the motifs*) of those who will pray there ?

    motif = motive and both spellings are correct. Have a look at a good dictionary.

    Is it possible that you have already made the decision “who is guilty” as prosecutor, investigator and judge in one person ?

    I dislike the word “Kollektivschuld” (collective guilt) but there is another term: collective responsibility. You could read about it in essays by Ralph Giordano or Rabbi Leopold Neuhaus (essay about the “Reichskristallnacht” = Night of Broken Glass, 1945). There is a morally collective complicity if people don’t stand up against terrorism or an murderous ideology like Nazism and simply look the other way. Since more than three decades Islam stands for the death of hundreds of thousands of people of all religions killed in terror attacks: Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and of course fellow Muslims.

    Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is no exception because he is NOT condemning terrorism. He refuses to condemn the terror organization Hamas and he is closely affiliated with and financed by a group which was the main donor (US$ 300,000+) to the “Flotilla”-movement. Another case is that he is scanning all nations all over the world how compatible their constitutions are to sharia. Does this ring some bells ? No ?

    With not a single word I denied that there are good Muslim people. I’ve clashed quite often with other members of the blogmocracy about to lump together all Muslims but I’m neither naive nor stupid.

    Let me end with a last sentence: you’re right, I do not grant the same protections of America to Americans ‘I do not like’, because I’m not American. ;-)

    Got it ?

  58. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 1:13 pm | #378

    Sarahlover said,

    on August 7, 2010 on 9:22 am

    I was here replying to everyone long before you got here. Do you really think that inane line of talk is anything other than stupid.

    Dance little penis man! Dance for me!

    Well, that clarifies it pretty much right there.

    Ice, so nice of you to stop by and play. (That phallus obsession had to come out sooner or later)

  59. Guggi
    August 7, 2010 at 2:46 pm | #379

    Maybe LvQ wants to have a closer look at the website of the organization whose “principal” partner Imam Rauf (you that moderate one) is:

    http://www.perdana4peace.org/

  60. Typicalwhitey
    August 7, 2010 at 6:26 pm | #382

    I thought saralover was that stupid bitch iceweasel.
    What a C***.

    • NoMo
      August 7, 2010 at 6:34 pm | #383

      You never know,there are only about 8 actual posters at the swamp. ;-)

  61. NoMo
    August 7, 2010 at 6:32 pm | #384

    Thank you for the lecture reb Lewdie..Better start saving for the jizya.Being a self righteous prig won’t pay the bills. :D

  62. snowcrash
    August 7, 2010 at 6:47 pm | #385

    365 comments! I never know who the trolls from LGF are, they all sound exactly the same.

    • Guggi
      August 7, 2010 at 7:55 pm | #386

      >>>>”I never know who the trolls from LGF are, they all sound exactly the same.”<<<<

      Because all of them are brainwashed.

  63. Voltaire’s Crack
    August 7, 2010 at 9:31 pm | #388

    Hey TurdLover. Need a rest from building the same strawman over and over?

  64. My Little Ponytail
    August 7, 2010 at 9:34 pm | #389

    I thinks we forgotted one. This one smells kinda like Reggie.

  65. Voltaires Crack
    August 7, 2010 at 10:45 pm | #390

    Has libtard run out of strawmen yet?

  66. Formercorpsman
    August 7, 2010 at 10:46 pm | #391

    I remember when iceweasel first started posting over there.

    Right off the bat the debate tactic was the straw man. I called her on it. Well, it rules the day over there.

    She also had / had a habit of using penile references as support for her arguments. Thus, when that card was thrown down, it was obvious.

  67. Voltaires Crack
    August 7, 2010 at 10:52 pm | #392

    LVQ: The Ted Baxter of physics.

  68. The Original
    August 7, 2010 at 11:18 pm | #393

    Well, I started to read this thread, but this “sarahlover” just is way too much. Same points are being made over and over again.

    Do you know why I think this mosque will end up making things worse for Muslims? Their call to prayer 5 times every single day. Can you imagine having to deal with that every day? There is no way that sound will not reach Ground Zero. 5 times every single day those people in and around the building will be reminded of who destroyed the WTC and the innocent people inside.

    sarahlover made a statement about corporations putting offices in building that were going to be erected on Ground Zero as if that was an evil deed. Guess what . . . not returning that space to an office building for corporations (and other forms of business) would be like letting the Muslims win. Evil should never win in our country.

    • Formercorpsman
      August 7, 2010 at 11:50 pm | #394

      I agree. A leftist, as we see, would not.

  69. buzzsawmonkey
    August 8, 2010 at 4:26 pm | #395

    Kind of pointless responding to some roadshow troll rather than the flipped Lewd Wig himself.

    But it is interesting, is it not, to see all these staunch defenders of the “right to do what you will with your private property” who doubtless see nothing wrong with preventing someone doing exactly that if

    a) The property owner wanted to build a Wal-Mart;
    b) If some crazed federal agency decides that there is an endangered snail on the owner’s land that needs protecting (or that it is an “essential wetland,” or something of the sort); or
    c) If, just for the sake of argument, the owner wanted to put up a billboard, or a tableau, in their front yard or atop their building which expressed a political opinion with which these “defenders of the First Amendment” disagreed.

    Certainly, given the number of people expressing their First Amendment rights on behalf of the Republican candidate for president during the last election who had their signs and property vandalized, it would appear that Leftist reference for the First Amendment is highly selective. Certainly the number of times that private property owners have been told they must “bow to community pressure” and not build big-box stores somewhere (including New York City) suggests that they have no basis for whimpering about Muslims “being forced to bow to community pressure” in this instance.

    One thing nobody has yet discussed, by the way, is whether a Muslim “community” of any sort actually exists anywhere near the proposed location of this “community center.” The Wall Street area has seen many new residential constructions over the past decade plus, but it hardly seems likely that there is a sufficient Muslim presence in the area (even after the Halal Mafia has driven off the non-Muslim street vendors) to justify a 13-story “community center.” Not even the highly Muslim ghetto of Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn has required a “community center” of that size—and, unlike Ground Zero, that is an actual Muslim community.

    • Heracles
      August 8, 2010 at 6:45 pm | #396

      Interesting take.No doubt there are Muslims who work in the fiancial sector but I am not aware of any great down town Islamic community. The Mosque is pure “triumphalism”..

      • buzzsawmonkey
        August 8, 2010 at 7:04 pm | #397

        Yes, the mosque is triumphalism—but there are plenty of people who will refuse to look at that reality.

        An objective reality that they can, perhaps, bring themselves to look at is the grossly disproportionate size of a “community center” larger than any other such “community center” in the greater New York metropolitan area—and one which is in no way justified by the size of any extant or adjacent Muslim community.

        That being the case, who/what is this “community center” for, since a religious center for a religion with no or virtually no presence in the area would seem absurd…unless, of course, you realize that it is a center for triumphalism, conversion, and conquest.

    • Guggi
      August 9, 2010 at 2:59 pm | #398

      The community has doubled it’s numbers during the last decade and is now about 50,000.

      • buzzsawmonkey
        August 9, 2010 at 5:21 pm | #399

        Citywide, maybe; there are large Muslim enclaves in Bay Ridge and in a couple of Queens neighborhoods as well as in what should now be called Kabul Hill (rather than Cobble Hill). There are certainly not 50,000 Muslims in Lower Manhattan, and there is no neighborhood, out of all the Muslim enclaves, that would support, in the neighborhood itself, a 13-story “community center.”

        There is no way on earth that a sectarian “community center” of this size can be justified by an existing community, which was the reason for such initially-sectarian community centers as the 92nd Street Y, to which this project is being falsely compared.

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 695 other followers