Home > Animal Farm Lunacy, Little Green Footballs > Chuckie and Ted Olson

Chuckie and Ted Olson

August 18, 2010

I start with this screenshot…

Ok, that’s fine. He brings Ted Olson into the picture. Fair enough. The only reason I see for Ted Olson supporting the Hamasque is that he went nuts over losing his wife in the 9/11 attacks.

Here is the Free Republic thread that Chuckie refers to…
Now look at screenshot 2:

Hmm, did you bother to ask OneCenterRight if he/she lost a family member or friend in the attacks? Did you, Charles? I bet you didn’t.

But this is the best of all. Enter screenshot 3:

I see nothing in there that is insulting to anyone. Anyone! And the freaks bury Odahi in downdings. Trust me, if you look down that thread, every post of Odahi gets massive amounts of downdings, ridicule and suckage.

Carry on, gentle readers of the Diary. Behold the massive idiot!

ps: I support the posters on the freeper thread. How bout that?

  1. August 18, 2010 at 7:55 pm | #1

    He’s Totalitarian, who is he to tell people if they can speak.

  2. Persephonexoxo
    August 18, 2010 at 7:59 pm | #2

    And Charles, you and your psychophants have no right to tell the 911 families that they need to accept this.

    Oh, and YOU don’t know what you are talking about.

    Isn’t that the equivalent of teenagers saying “whatever!!” when they are losing an argument??

    What a dick.

    • August 18, 2010 at 8:04 pm | #3

      Everytime CJ steps in shit, he’s gonna get called out.

      • August 19, 2010 at 2:32 am | #4

        “Everytime CJ steps in shit, he’s gonna get called out.”

        Actually, every time the stupid fuck douchebag steps in shit, he steps on himself.

  3. My Little Ponytail
    August 18, 2010 at 8:10 pm | #5

    King, you don’t get it. It’s not about the mosque. It’s about Pam.

    • August 19, 2010 at 12:31 am | #6

      Pamela should have kicked selrahC in the nads when she had the chance!

      • My Little Ponytail
        August 19, 2010 at 12:37 am | #7

        How do you know she didn’t?

      • Princess Natasha
        August 19, 2010 at 10:47 am | #8

        What nads?

  4. My Little Ponytail
    August 18, 2010 at 8:12 pm | #9

    And FWIW, yes they have the legal right to build the damn thing. Just like the Nazis had the legal right to march through Skokie, Il.

    So Chuck, do you support the Nazis?

    • August 19, 2010 at 2:44 am | #10

      I was born and raised in Skokie. Don’t get me started on this topic. The movie “Skokie”, starring Danny Kaye, Carl Reiner, and the late, great Lee Strasberg was partially filmed at my high school, Niles East.

      Temple Judea Mitzpah was right down from the street I grew up on, Greenleaf St. I went there for services with my best friends Gregg and Terry Shapiro. They went with me to St. Peters Catholic church. I’m not a Jew, but my best friends were. I have nothing but great memories from living there…

    • Arachne
      August 19, 2010 at 9:53 am | #11

      Yes, he does, apparently. And in Kumquat’s brand of linear thinking, he is a Nazi himself.

  5. buzzsawmonkey
    August 18, 2010 at 8:14 pm | #12

    Once again, supporting—or rather, recognizing—the right to build the mosque is not the same as considering it the right thing to do. In that sense, therefore, I “support the right” to build it—which is to say, I recognize that to someone who is incapable of analysis, the soft words of “freedom of religion” would seem to mandate such support.

    However, that said, I do not think that those arguing in favor of the Ground Zero Mosque would be quite so vehement in their support for “freedom of religion” if Fred Phelps, or even Pat Robertson, were to announce plans to build an “outreach center” for gays across the street from San Francisco’s primary AIDS clinic. Hell, I know for a fact that the same people who are acting all vehement about the sanctity of “private property rights” where this mosque is concerned have shown absolutely no such concern for private property rights—or the needs of the community—when Wal-Mart has tried to build a store in New York. Then, every power of zoning regulation, environmental impact, “community organizer” concern, etc., etc., has been brought to bear to ensure that the owners of private property could not open a legitimate business supplying legitimate products to willing buyers.

    In this case, of course, there is no legitimate business being proposed. There is no local Muslim community in Lower Manhattan—and if there were, it would certainly not be one which is large enough to require, or support, a structure of this sort, which is bigger than anything supported by any of the large, existing Muslim communities in New York City.

    Furthermore, like it or not, even if our leaders refuse to admit that we are at war with radical Islam, radical Islam is at war with us, and has been for decades. There is no excuse—”freedom of religion” notwithstanding—for permitting a structure at the site of a radical Islam victory which is being proposed by someone who supports the genocidal terrorists of Hamas, and who has said in the past that the US is in some sense responsible for 9/11, the more so in that he has not ruled out funding from Iran and Saudi Arabia.

    • Guggi
      August 19, 2010 at 2:30 am | #13

      Hi, buzz, I looked for some information about the Muslim population in Lower Manhattan and I’ve to correct myself regarding a previous claim I made. You’re correct, there is NO local Muslim community in Lower Manhattan.

  6. buzzsawmonkey
    August 18, 2010 at 8:43 pm | #14

    I would say, further, that even if all of the 9/11 families agreed that building the mosque was OK (as opposed to a very small minority of them), that still would not make building it OK. The 9/11 families, much as we grieve for and with them and honor their losses, do not hold an exclusive franchise on the Ground Zero site; 9/11 affected the entire city, the entire country—indeed, briefly, a large part of the entire world.

    The “appeal to authority,” one of the logical fallacies that Mad King Yertle was always fond of using—and fond of decrying if used by those with whom he disagreed—does not work here. We all, as Americans, have a right to voice our opinion on this matter, and Americans, who have overwhelmingly extended astonishing tolerance to the Muslims within our midst as jihad plot after jihad plot has come boiling out of their communities and places of worship, have overwhelmingly said that this one place where the Muslims to whom such tolerance has been and continues to be extended are damned well overdue to show some reciprocity.

  7. Heracles
    August 18, 2010 at 8:51 pm | #15

    So if Ted Olson came out against the Mosque would fatso have condemned him as a bigot?

    • My Little Ponytail
      August 18, 2010 at 9:10 pm | #16

      Do bears crap in the… nevermind.

  8. Heracles
    August 18, 2010 at 8:54 pm | #17

    He supports the right to build the mosque,(nobody said they do not have the right, only that it is inappropriate to build it next to the WTC) he said nothing about whether he wants it built over there. Charles Johnson is one dumb fuck!

  9. buzzsawmonkey
    August 18, 2010 at 9:00 pm | #18

    Heracles :
    He supports the right to build the mosque,(nobody said they do not have the right, only that it is inappropriate to build it next to the WTC) he said nothing about whether he wants it built over there. Charles Johnson is one dumb fuck!

    I would disagree with your “one dumb fuck” remark. He was clever enough to sucker a lot of people at least if not more intelligent than he into thinking he was something he wasn’t, for several years running. More to the point, what we are dealing here is not stupidity, but intentional lying to make a political point. That the Mad King lies without scruple is something many of us have had occasion to learn firsthand; in this instance, like those he has allied himself with, Obama and Pelosi, he is lying in order to further a political ideology.

    • My Little Ponytail
      August 18, 2010 at 9:12 pm | #19

      He was clever enough to sucker a lot of people at least if not more intelligent than he into thinking he was something he wasn’t, for several years running.

      Easy enough when he never says anything. You know the old Twain thing, better to keep your mouth shut..

  10. August 18, 2010 at 9:09 pm | #20

    Wow….so now the be-mulleted malamute is the arbiter of which families of those murdered on 9/11 can say what about whoever?

  11. lakesoftheclouds
    August 18, 2010 at 10:04 pm | #21

    Well, that about finishes it for me. I will not be going back there. I never have gone to Kos because of, well, this particular brand of frighteningly stupid, crowing bout how brilliant they are. The instantaneous, seismic shift to the far, far, far moonbat left is one of the strangest things I have ever seen. LGF now makes Code Pink look almost sane.

    • Voltaires Crack
      August 18, 2010 at 10:25 pm | #22

      Is that your nic over in Johnsontown? I don’t recognize it.

      • lakesoftheclouds
        August 18, 2010 at 10:42 pm | #23

        NO. I am remaining anonymous for the moment to protect a few friends who are hanging on over there, hopefully not for long. Too damned toxic. Now you need a mask and hazmat suit to read that blog. It is a toilet now.

  12. Philip_Daniel
    August 18, 2010 at 10:58 pm | #24

    Fenway_Nation :
    malamute

    Don’t you mean MAMELUKE? Comparing CJ to a canine is insulting to the canine…much better to call him a Muslim White Slave Soldier…much more accurate…except he lacks the courage and intelligence of that famous caste…

  13. Voltaires Crack
    August 18, 2010 at 11:16 pm | #25

    lakesoftheclouds :
    NO. I am remaining anonymous for the moment to protect a few friends who are hanging on over there, hopefully not for long. Too damned toxic. Now you need a mask and hazmat suit to read that blog. It is a toilet now.

    Yes, it’s coming back now. You were here several days or so ago. Zany stuff going on over there. Wonder what it will be like on election night in 11 weeks, given Chuckholz’s prior predictions that the R’s are now only a regional party and will lose more seats in November. You know there will be a lot of ‘Oh noes, the theocrats have taken over the world’ posts at that time.

    I hope none of the readers have a Hale-Bopp moment after investing so much faith in his written word.

    More freakiness to come.

    • lakesoftheclouds
      August 18, 2010 at 11:18 pm | #26

      LOL, Oh, the exploding heads on election night. Best to stay indoors and keep Lysol handy for your neighborhood cleanup!

      • August 19, 2010 at 12:29 am | #27

        But which heads will explode?

  14. August 19, 2010 at 12:26 am | #28

    And the frakking mosque shouldn’t be build. Period. It is an abomination, because it is of Islam…the Disease, wrapped around an Ideology, inside a Cult.
    But since it will get built anyway, non-Mohammedans should resolve to DESECRATE it ieach and every day of its existence. With things such as Pig Lard or Liquid SPAM®.

  15. MrPaulRevere
    August 19, 2010 at 3:12 am | #29

    This is serious business people…it’s time to clean your weapons, duct tape your window’s and hide your daughters…the dreaded Flemish menace has returned: Charles8/18/2010 9:05:04 pm PDT

    * 24
    * down
    * up
    * report

    Man … am I ever glad I didn’t get sucked into the circle of these freaks. As soon as I learned the background of Filip DeWinter, I started getting nauseous about where the so-called “anti-jihad” movement was headed.

    • PeteP
      August 19, 2010 at 7:29 am | #30

      I started getting nauseous about where the so-called “anti-jihad” movement was headed.

      So Chuck decided instead to enable the jihad movement.

    • Arachne
      August 19, 2010 at 9:55 am | #31

      Johnson should know all about “suckage.” His blog is full of it.

  16. nil stooge
    August 19, 2010 at 10:44 am | #32

    Framing the argument correctly gets you nothing but downdings in loozardville:

    36- Spare O’Lake -12 6 replies (15 total)
    Like Obama, Olsen said he agrees that they have the legal right to build there.
    It is not clear whether Olsen, like Obama, declined to comment on the “wisdom” of it.
    Gingrich also conceded the legal right, IIRC, but says it was a bad idea.
    Patterson also concedes the legal right, but wants to see if it can be moved voluntarily.
    Even nut Geller said on her CNN interview that this was not about the legal right to build the mosque there. She is of course virulently arguing that the mosque is a terrible, hateful idea.
    So all that anybody is arguing about is whether the mosque is a good idea, not whether it is legal.
    So how is this still a constitutional issue at this point?

    • Arachne
      August 19, 2010 at 10:55 am | #33

      It’s not, nils – they can only advance Part 1 of the argument. They never touch Part 2 because they’re on the losing side of it.

      And notice how he slams the Freepers. Oooo, Chuckie, would that be the same Freepers who noticed the forgeries and whose work you appropriated for your famous smoking memo that was your biggest claim to fame — THOSE Freepers? Hey, Jim-Rob just raised $88,000 from “those Freepers” — how’s that Tip Jar working for ya?

  17. The Original
    August 19, 2010 at 10:52 am | #34

    Charles has no room to talk about bigots or bigotry. He is clearly an anti-Christian bigot. I could not believe the lies that he spews about Christianity and Creationists. I never posted there, but I used to read it until he started his constant barrage against Christians. I don’t care being called names, but I do not like it when those things I hold dear are lied about.

    About Ted Olson . . . he also represented the group who sued to have CA’s Prop 8 overturned. I saw his interview the night the decision was announced. I don’t think we can consider Ted Olson as conservative.

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 695 other followers