Deranged Crank gets smacked down again
Mad Chuckles Update
Posted by: Emperor Misha I
August 25, 2010 at 2:43 am
Because we simply can’t resist making fun of the Lizard Queen and his hypocrisy.
He just got done tongue-bathing New York’s equally insane mayor, Bloomberg, calling him a “real leader” and giving him “big LGF kudos” (which is, it seems, some particularly nasty variant of herpes genitalis), for saying the following:
To implicate all of Islam for the actions of a few who twisted a great religion is unfair and un-American.
If only Mad King Chuckles would follow that same principle, then perhaps those of us who monitor his monkey cage to poke sticks at him wouldn’t have to endure a triumphant post of his every other day declaring “definitive proof of the racist, Nazi, theocratifascistotalibanic nature of the entire Tea Party (and the GOP and, in matter of fact, anybody as much as breathing a word of disapproval in the general direction of The Great Obama)“, attached to a picture of some obvious liberal plant at a Tea Party Rally.
Instead we get an endless supply of comic relief so, in the end, maybe it’s not such a bad thing.
Yes, Chuckles, we’re laughing. But not with you.
Thatisall.
Hold That Thought Update: Consider this. When a single, solitary liberal plant (or garden variety racist, lunatic shitbag, not much of a difference there, really) shows up at a Tea Party Rally with a swastika painted on his forehead and some incredibly disgusting slogan painted, crudely, on a sign, the entire Obamedia (and Chuckles, who is still dreaming of being taken seriously one day) is a-twitter for weeks on end about how this is “evidence” that the entire Tea Party Movement are “dangerous extremists”.
Of course they all, including Media Matters, funded heavily by a known and proven WWII Nazi collaborator, George Soros, helpfully edit out the inevitable ass-kicking that said racist clown gets by everybody else at the rally since it doesn’t fit The Narrative™.
On the other hand, when 15,903 (and counting) murderous terrorist attacks are committed in the name of pisslam and barely a murmur of disapproval is heard from the 1,000,000,000+ adherents of said “faith”, all of us are endlessly lectured how the actions of a “few” cannot, must not indict the beliefs of the many and that to even think about drawing a connection is “racist” and “unAmerican”…
Are we the only one seeing a disparity here?
Oh well, as liberal fascists always say: “If standards are good, then surely double standards are twice as good?”
I think the absolutely funniest divorced from reality moment I’ve seen with these clowns in recent memory was last night, when one of them stated enthsiastically that if a post regarding GWB’s pastor made it to the “top ten comments” that President Bush was “Sure to see it.”
Because, of course, Chunky the Wonder Twit matters. They have to believe it over there. They’re like the Manson followers, without the mayhem. Chunky knows all, and they beeeeelieve. Because that makes the ridicule worth it. It never dawns on them that they’re holding up a false God and the ridcule – well, the ridicule is just that.
The Manson Family is an apt analogy. iceweasel and Jimmah being Susan Atkins and Tex Watson.
I still don’t know how Mandy and lawhawk stay there. Especially lawhawk. I wonder if he doesn’t see himself as the eminence grise over there and is reluctant to relinquish his role. Of course, he may already be here or at the Deuce under another name, testing the waters, and Mandy as well.
Lawhawk is a Progressive bow.
Now that is a righteous smmackdown!
[/Applause]
I suspect he likes the deference that he gets from the children over at lGF.
So, wait, all the classical mufasirin of Islam twisted the true meaning of the deen?
“1. Al-Hanafiyah:
It says in Fath al-Qadeer by Ibn Humaam 5/187: “al-Jihaad: calling the Kuffar to the religion of truth and to fight them if they do not accept”. al-Kaasaani said in al-Badaa’i’, 9/4299 “To sacrifice ones strength and energy in Fighting in the way of Allah ‘Azza wa-Jal with ones life, property and the tongue and whatever besides”.
2. Al-Maalikiyah:
For a Muslim to fight against a Kaafir who is not under oath, to raise the word of Allah, or if he (Kaafir) is in his (Muslim’s) presence (in order to attack him), or upon his (Kaafir) entering his (Muslim’s) land. (Haashiya al-‘Adawi/as-Sa’eedi 2/2 and ash-Sharh as-Sagheer/Aqrab al-Masaalik by ad-Dardeer 2/267)
3. Ash-Shaafi’iyah:
Al-Baajawari said, “al-Jihaad means: al-Qitaal (fighting) in the way of Allah”, al-Baajawari / Ibnul-Qaasim 2/261. Ibn Hajr said in al-Fath 6/2, “…and legally (it means) sacrificial striving in fighting the Kuffar”
4. Al-Hanbaliyah:
“To Fight the Kuffar” see Mataalibu Ulin-Nahi 2/497. “al-Jihaad is al-Qitaal (fighting) and to sacrifice all strength in it to raise the Word of Allah”, see ‘Umdatul-Fiqh p.166, and Muntahal-Iraadaat 1/302.”–Al-Jihad Linguistically and Legally, ‘Abdullah Yusuf ‘Azzam, “Introduction by Abuz-Zubair” http://www.islamicawakening.com/viewarticle.php?articleID=685
Did Muhammad hijack his own deen?
“[The poetess Asma bint Marwan said] ‘You obey a stranger [Muhammad] who encourages you to murder for booty. You are greedy men. Is there no honor among you?’ Upon hearing those lines Muhammad said, ‘Will no one rid me of this woman?’ Umayr, a zealous Muslim, decided to execute the Prophet’s wishes. That very night he crept into the writer’s home while she lay sleeping surrounded by her young children. There was one at her breast. Umayr removed the suckling babe and then plunged his sword into the poet. The next morning in the mosque, Muhammad, who was aware of the assassination, said, ‘You have helped Allah and His Apostle.’ Umayr said. ‘She had five sons; should I feel guilty?’ ‘No,’ the Prophet answered. ‘Killing her was as meaningless as two goats butting heads.’”–
Sirat Rasul Allah of ibn Ishaq, 676