Home > Animal Farm Lunacy, Charles "Icarus" Johnson, Little Green Footballs, Totalitarian Progressives > San Francisco Zionist shows her Christian hating colors

San Francisco Zionist shows her Christian hating colors

September 16, 2010

The Hispnophobic fake Fraudulent Zionist who dodges imaginary Katusha Rockets from Berkley  once again shows her vile nature. She attacks the Pope for his speech where he quoted a Byzantine Emperor’s observation that Islam is spread through the sword. She gets angry at him because it pissed off her beloved Islamic-Imperialists.

This vile human is clearly a Catholic hater. She’s the first Zionist who ever supported Sharia law and supports Islamic genocide. She is no Zionist!

  1. My Little Ponytail
    September 16, 2010 at 11:34 pm | #1

    Don’t do the Jews any favors, bitch.

  2. Persephonexoxo
    September 16, 2010 at 11:34 pm | #2

    First, the speech wasn’t ABOUT the Byzantine Emporer dumbass. He used a qoute from him. Second. Mr. Ratzinger? I am sure that in her mind the emphasis is on “Rat”. Real funny idiot.

    • wolfie
      September 17, 2010 at 12:09 am | #3

      I suppose it would be too much to ask her/him to actually READ the speech before denouncing it.
      But hey! Why bother?! Whatever it was, it was wicked popery! ;)

  3. Persephonexoxo
    September 16, 2010 at 11:52 pm | #4

    Wow, those assholes sure know more about Hitler and what he was all about than SOMEONE WHO WAS ACTUALLY THERE!!!!!!!!!!!! Will they talk this way about an imam or even moe? All they can drum up is what the church did centuries ago. Now that someone else is doing the same, or far worse, it is called diversity. *spit*

  4. buzzsawmonkey
    September 17, 2010 at 12:01 am | #5

    Open message to SFZ: yes, Christianity has converted by the sword—but not for a very long time.

    Judaism, too, converted by the sword, once upon a time—but not for a very, very long time. Judaism is older than Christianity, so it is no surprise that Judaism stopped conversion by the sword long before Christianity did.

    Islam still converts by the sword. Now, today. Here. There. Everywhere. Cartoonists in hiding. Universities coerced into providing footbaths. Schoolchildren in Massachusetts conned into reciting the shahada on field trips. Smarmy, fraudulent imams attempting to construct “community centers” adjacent to the massacre sites of their co-religionists.

    • Qob
      September 17, 2010 at 1:25 pm | #6

      word! I think it’s amazingly dumb how folks compare the history of Christianity (which has been repented of) with the current unrepented practices of islam. Both Judaism and Christianity had their adolescence, both were violent and aggressive, but both grew up. islam, as a whole, has not grown up.

  5. September 17, 2010 at 12:04 am | #7

    I disagree, SFZ is a real Zionist, she gave my pro-Israel posts at LGF consistent support over the years I was there. Her only fault is being a liberal (the horror).

    • wolfie
      September 17, 2010 at 12:29 am | #8

      Sorry to disappoint you, but I never cared, much less was horrified, that she was a liberal. (I rather liked reasonably polite contrarians…. like Cognito and avanti, say.)

      I agree with you that she seems a true supporter of Israel. I myself never witnessed any anti-Israel sentiment from her.

      I found her oft-expressed anti-Catholic bigotry tedious, but to each his own.

  6. September 17, 2010 at 12:07 am | #9

    Persephonexoxo :
    Wow, those assholes sure know more about Hitler and what he was all about than SOMEONE WHO WAS ACTUALLY THERE!!!!!!!!!!!! Will they talk this way about an imam or even moe? All they can drum up is what the church did centuries ago. Now that someone else is doing the same, or far worse, it is called diversity. *spit*

    Er, he was indeed “ACTUALLY THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!”, just on the wrong side, Hitlerjugend to be specific.

    • My Little Ponytail
      September 17, 2010 at 12:25 am | #10

      Oh, please.

    • wolfie
      September 17, 2010 at 12:56 am | #11

      The Ratzinger family was ANTI-Nazi from the outset. (The “medical” extermination of a couple of relatives, including a favorite cousin with Downs Syndrome, hardened young Joseph’s personal enmity.)
      All German boys were REQUIRED to join the Hitler Youth at age 14. Joseph was therefore registered but DARED to skip the meetings.
      When the war……..
      Oh hell. Why bother?

      • Philip_Daniel
        September 17, 2010 at 1:02 am | #12

        The Ratzingers opposed the Nazis, which means that they are Nazis…

        Alija Izetbegovic recruited for the SS Handzar, which means that he was not a Nazi…

        Confusing…

  7. Philip_Daniel
    September 17, 2010 at 1:02 am | #13

    SFZionist –

    “In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the [Muslim] mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united [in Islam], so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them [i.e. religion and politics] at the same time. The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense…Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations…Thereafter, there were dissensions among the Christians with regard to their religion and to Christology…We do not think that we should blacken the pages of this book with discussion of their dogmas of unbelief. In general, they are well known. All of them are unbelief. This is clearly stated in the noble Qur’an. [To] discuss or argue those things with them is not up to us. It is [for them to choose between] conversion to Islam, payment of the poll tax, or death.”–Ibn Khaldun, The Muqudimmah: An Introduction to History (pp. 60, 473, 480)

    Understand?

  8. Bagua
    September 17, 2010 at 1:55 am | #14

    wolfie :

    The Ratzinger family was ANTI-Nazi from the outset. (The “medical” extermination of a couple of relatives, including a favorite cousin with Downs Syndrome, hardened young Joseph’s personal enmity.)
    All German boys were REQUIRED to join the Hitler Youth at age 14. Joseph was therefore registered but DARED to skip the meetings.
    When the war……..
    Oh hell. Why bother?

    Oh, I’m well aware of all that, but he was certainly on the other side and served in Luftwaffenhelfer when he was of military age. So yes, he was there, fighting for the Nazis, whether his family supported them or not.

    I note that by way of contrast, I’ve seen George Soros demonised as exactly an “evil Nazi”, for his participation when his community was being decimated, likewise at the age of 14. Thereafter he never fought for the Nazis.

    • Guggi
      September 17, 2010 at 2:50 am | #15

      Thank you, Bagua, well said.

      • wolfie
        September 17, 2010 at 1:26 pm | #16

        Which part was “well said?”
        The part that says you shouldn’t demonize Soros for what survival forced him to do when he was young? (I agree.)
        Or the part that goes on to say that you SHOULD demonize Ratzinger for what survival forced him to do?

    • Grimcargo
      September 17, 2010 at 6:10 am | #17

      I don’t despise George Soros for anything other than the man he is today. He is an unscruplous bastard and as contrary to the good of this country as sharia law.

    • m
      September 17, 2010 at 8:24 am | #18

      Actually, nobody laid blame on the 14 yr old boy – they condemn the 80 yr old man that didn’t think it was a problem.

    • September 17, 2010 at 11:45 am | #19

      San Francisco Zionist is a Hispanophobe. She brags about teh near genocide of my Spanish ancestors. She can fuck off for all I care. She’s no Zionist as we have documented she supports SHaria law and is Pro Muzzie.

    • wolfie
      September 17, 2010 at 1:20 pm | #20

      For the record, I have never demonized Soros for what he did when he was so young and in such dire straits.
      I believe it is YOU who is applying a double standard here.
      Soros was merely “participating” to save his own life. Ratzinger was “fighting for the Nazis.” (What do you think happened to draft-dodgers in Nazi Germany? You think they got a ticket to Canada?)

      He was “on the other side” because he happened to be a German. Period.
      And since you are so “well aware” of his record, you know he never saw combat and deserted at the first safe opportunity. Being “well aware,” you also know that your implication that there was a difference between his family’s anti-Nazi views and his own personal views is sleazy. (“fighting for the Nazis, whether his family supported them or not.”)

      I am reluctant to judge anyone, young or old, for what they do merely to survive.
      I do judge what they do later when they are out of harm’s way. What have they made of their experiences? Do they reflect on them? Have they learned anything about the world and about their own human frailty?

  9. Grimcargo
    September 17, 2010 at 6:06 am | #21

    Littlewoman you lost me with this: infuriated some muslims. Comere let me put salt on ye and maybe you disappear.

  10. mtc
    September 17, 2010 at 8:40 am | #22

    Insulting the Pope whose only crime was being born and raised in the wrong place and and at the wrong time in history is wrong. We Catholics believe that God chose him via the college of Cardinals, to lead the Catholic Church. Some trivia: His titles are: Vicar of Christ,Successor to the Prince of the Apostles, Vicegerent of the Almighty(I like that one!), Servant of the Servants of God, Archbishop of Italy and Bishop of Rome, and, of course, Holy Father and His Holiness. So take that, SFZ. Calling him Ratzinger is wrong.

  11. My Little Ponytail
    September 17, 2010 at 10:10 am | #23

    It seems that some people want to have it both ways; complaining about bigotry against religion x, while reserving the right to join the Ku Klux Klan in bashing Roman Catholics.

    • Qob
      September 17, 2010 at 1:28 pm | #24

      It should be noted that the KKK was the militant arm of the Democrat Party for about 60 years…

  12. refugee000
    September 17, 2010 at 10:38 am | #25

    Bagua :
    I disagree, SFZ is a real Zionist, she gave my pro-Israel posts at LGF consistent support over the years I was there. Her only fault is being a liberal (the horror).

    She’s a self hating moonbat, so desperate to stay in der fuhrer’s good graces that she now champions sharia and Islam uber alles.

  13. Hercales
    September 17, 2010 at 11:05 am | #26

    Listen scrunt – keep your left wing ideology and bigotry to yourself. The catholic Church (my church) these days is no threat to the Jews unlike your Islamic friends.

  14. Hercales
    September 17, 2010 at 11:08 am | #27

    Bagua :

    wolfie :
    The Ratzinger family was ANTI-Nazi from the outset. (The “medical” extermination of a couple of relatives, including a favorite cousin with Downs Syndrome, hardened young Joseph’s personal enmity.)
    All German boys were REQUIRED to join the Hitler Youth at age 14. Joseph was therefore registered but DARED to skip the meetings.
    When the war……..
    Oh hell. Why bother?

    Oh, I’m well aware of all that, but he was certainly on the other side and served in Luftwaffenhelfer when he was of military age. So yes, he was there, fighting for the Nazis, whether his family supported them or not.
    I note that by way of contrast, I’ve seen George Soros demonised as exactly an “evil Nazi”, for his participation when his community was being decimated, likewise at the age of 14. Thereafter he never fought for the Nazis.

    Terrible analogy – Ratzinger had no choice about joining the Hitelrjugend. Soros made a choice to help his adopted Gentile father inventory Jewish property. The thing that bothers me is that he has no regrets about it. Pope Benedict is a friend of the Jews, George Soros works for their destruction.

  15. Arachne
    September 17, 2010 at 11:24 am | #28

    Dear SFZ: Here’s a bulletin for you – Speaking for the World’s Roman Catholic population, we don’t give a shit what you think. Now or ever.

  16. King Minos
    September 17, 2010 at 12:47 pm | #29

    So Ratzinger was a loyal member of the Hitler Youth? Not so!

    Following his 14th birthday in 1941, Ratzinger was conscripted into the Hitler Youth — as membership was required by law for all 14-year old German boys after December 1939 — but was an unenthusiastic member who refused to attend meetings. His father was an enemy of Nazism, believing it conflicted with the Catholic faith. In 1941, one of Ratzinger’s cousins, a 14-year-old boy with Down syndrome, was taken away by the Nazi regime and killed during the Aktion T4 campaign of Nazi eugenics. In 1943, while still in seminary, he was drafted into the German anti-aircraft corps as Luftwaffenhelfer. Ratzinger then trained in the German infantry, but a subsequent illness precluded him from the usual rigours of military duty. As the Allied front drew closer to his post in 1945, he deserted back to his family’s home in Traunstein after his unit had ceased to exist, just as American troops established their headquarters in the Ratzinger household. As a German soldier, he was put in a POW camp but was released a few months later at the end of the war in the summer of 1945. He reentered the seminary, along with his brother Georg, in November of that year.

    Go to Hell, SFZ, you ignorant pig.

  17. Qob
    September 17, 2010 at 1:33 pm | #30

    I am going to trot this out again, Paddy and Ahmed are both Boston cabbies. About the same time they decide to get serious in their respective faiths. Paddy goes to Mass and hears his priest tell him to love one another and count all men his brother, Ahmed goes to mosque and hears his imam preach from the quran that islam is to conquer the world and that the sons of pigs and dogs (jews and infidels) must be slain. … One is a religion the other is a terrorist movement. muslims are fine upstanding citizens as long as they don’t get serious about their religion.

  18. Formercorpsman
    September 17, 2010 at 2:10 pm | #31

    Bagua :I disagree, SFZ is a real Zionist, she gave my pro-Israel posts at LGF consistent support over the years I was there. Her only fault is being a liberal (the horror).

    Perhaps, once upon a time Bagua. No more, and really not for years running now.

    I don’t recall when you started posting there, (seriously, I don’t, not intended as a slight) but one term used constantly by most folks there, back when, was Cognitive dissonance.

    It rules the day over there. 24-7, it is an exercise in futility seeing how they make strawman arguments, immerse themselves in hyperbole, and totally miss the mark as it pertains to what the blog once stood for.

    Israel lives her daily existence under constant fire from islam. Literally constant fire, never allowed to let her guard down, always on the defensive. Every day that blog made sure the folks who participated, and who would visit, were reminded of this by bringing attention to the constant threat. How many posts do you see about it now? If she is such a staunch Zionist, why has she not complained about the shift in direction? Hell, she has jumped on the muslim sympathy bandwagon.

    She is as much a Zionist as Bill Clinton who was going to jump in the trenches with Isreal, if need be.

    • Bagua
      September 17, 2010 at 5:21 pm | #32

      @Formercorpsman,

      I remember you my friend, but I was mostly posting links when you were an active commenter, and I became a commenter after most folks had left. I never read the comments much before then and was pretty clueless when I dropped in during the flouncing.

      I do recall that every pro-Israel link I posted, and later every pro-Israel comment I made had a +1 from SanFransiscoZionist. Steady and reliable encouragement for my pro-Israel efforts.

      Politically we were quite different, she was left of center and I am a bit right of center. But I always respected her comments as she was always civil, clearly well educated, and a kind and descent person.

      We’d no doubt pull different levers in the voting box, but SanFranciscoZionist is my friend. I respect her and her intellect, and she would be welcome in my house and at my supper table any time she chose.

      • Formercorpsman
        September 17, 2010 at 10:54 pm | #33

        I think you could make that argument once upon a time, but just as the Killgore/Hot Air thread shows above, folks who might have had a moral conviction at one point can easily change in an effort to stay in someone’s good graces.

        I’m glad you are friends. I would never want that person having my back though. For all the vile posting they point out over there, they sure as hell find a way to post their own. (Insert log in eye) I have many friends who vote to the left that I have no problem with.

        Willful ignorance, and now adopting the islamic cause celeb? Forget it. Tat is speaking with a forked tongue, and she has done that too many times for me to give any benefit of the doubt.

    • Bagua
      September 17, 2010 at 6:00 pm | #34

      m :
      The only argument I saw was about his actions RIGHT NOW. His lack of regret.

      Perhaps, I’d have to go back and read that thread. As I recall, Soros was being branded an “evil Nazi” for exactly his actions as a 14 year old.

  19. Bagua
    September 17, 2010 at 4:41 pm | #35

    wolfie :
    Which part was “well said?”

    The part that says you shouldn’t demonize Soros for what survival forced him to do when he was young? (I agree.)

    Or the part that goes on to say that you SHOULD demonize Ratzinger for what survival forced him to do?

    In what way did I demonize Ratzinger? I pointed out factual history, that he was in fact a member of Hitler Youth and later in the German military at military age. Thus to the comment that “he was there”, well yes, on the German side.

    I contrasted this with the demonisation I have seen of Soros as an “evil Nazi” for his participation which ended at age 14, well below military age.

    So we agree that neither man should be demonised for their actions at age 14, and we should agree that Ratzinger also served in the German military during WWII.

    • My Little Ponytail
      September 17, 2010 at 5:00 pm | #36

      You’re trying to have it both ways. You’re claiming that Pope Benedict was “on the German side”, and then spinning by saying that you never meant to imply anything about Nazi affiliation, and then end repeating the “on the German side” claim.

      If the point of saying that wasn’t to imply that he’s a Nazi, what precisely was the point of it?

    • m
      September 17, 2010 at 5:54 pm | #37

      Do we agree that Soros is an ass for not even regretting what he had to do NOW?

      If not, at least we’d be arguing about the same thing.

  20. Bagua
    September 17, 2010 at 4:42 pm | #38

    Go to Hell, SFZ, you ignorant pig.

    Ignorant pig? What a vile and rude boy you are King Minos. You really should learn some manners.

  21. Bagua
    September 17, 2010 at 5:01 pm | #39

    Hercales :

    Terrible analogy – Ratzinger had no choice about joining the Hitelrjugend. Soros made a choice to help his adopted Gentile father inventory Jewish property. The thing that bothers me is that he has no regrets about it. Pope Benedict is a friend of the Jews, George Soros works for their destruction.

  22. Bagua
    September 17, 2010 at 5:04 pm | #40

    @Hercales:

    To be clear, I don’t blame either many for his actions as a 14 year old boy. Of the two, Soros was clearly under the most duress, only 1 in 4 of his community even survived. He was clearly in fear of his life.

    As adults, different story entirely, and different discussion.

    • m
      September 17, 2010 at 5:55 pm | #41

      The only argument I saw was about his actions RIGHT NOW. His lack of regret.

      • Formercorpsman
        September 17, 2010 at 11:03 pm | #42

        I think that is the disconnect the 2 sides are unable to communicate in this particular argument.

        They could both be held up as having been guilty at some point for involvement during their youth, but it sure seems a bitter pill to swallow hearing the recount of their youth, especially how it colors their view of history, and their involvement in it.

        I do blame him for not having some shred of guilt, retrospectively, of what he did, even if he had not much say in the matter.

        Add to that, his actions now, and over the years as using perhaps less than above board tactics in pushing his political views on the masses. For someone who so hates Capitalism, he sure has used it as a means to his ends, all the while looking to deprive others benefit of Capitalism also.

  23. Food Lion
    September 18, 2010 at 2:10 am | #43

    This bitch really grinds my gears.

  24. Opilio
    September 18, 2010 at 5:04 pm | #44

    with apologies™ testing html
    •functionality
    in
    DoD
    comments
       on a relatively   dead   thread.

    This concludes the my little test

  25. CharlesJohnsonLooneyTunes
    September 20, 2010 at 7:06 pm | #45

    waaaaaaaah you spoke the truth about SFZ you hurt me

    give it a rest bagua you bootlicker

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 695 other followers