Home > Animal Farm Lunacy, Cato, Charles "Icarus" Johnson, Killgore Trout > Icarus Johnson – still an effeminate, self hating dickwad, Killgore seems chagrined over his racist stunt, and Cato tries to play at being an economic theorist

Icarus Johnson – still an effeminate, self hating dickwad, Killgore seems chagrined over his racist stunt, and Cato tries to play at being an economic theorist

September 18, 2010
140

Charles Fri, Sep 17, 2010 7:05:15pm

re: #116 Killgore Trout

I see the stalkers are celebrating the one year anniversary of my Hot Air stunt.

re: #132 Reginald Perrin

Happy Anniversary
It took balls to pull off what you did at Hot Air. You exposed that they tolerated blatant racist comments.

Could not agree more.

And Hot Air still tolerates those comments, but so does the entire right wing blogosphere

143 Charles Fri, Sep 17, 2010 7:06:30pm

re: #137 Killgore Trout

You made some people aware of it. Sometimes that’s the only reward you get

169 Reginald Perrin Fri, Sep 17, 2010 7:22:52pm

re: #137 Killgore Trout

I’m still not proud of it but it happened. It was ugly and pointless. They still call the First lady a wookie and a Klingon on Hot Air (they were doing it earlier this week). My stunt made no difference.

Maybe someday when common sense returns to politics, you will be seen as one of the first to expose racism on right wing blogs.

BTW, the reason I said it took balls was because you posted under your
LGF name. You weren’t chicken shit like the stalkers who are afraid to use their blogmocracy names at their site stalking Charles 24/7. You laid your reputation on the line, I admire a man of principle.

172 Cato the Elder Fri, Sep 17, 2010 7:23:25pm

Has anyone here but me ever actually read Marx?

Because, you know, he is highly regarded in capitalist circles as the single greatest authority on their system, which is otherwise in this country misunderstood as a synonym for Mom’s apple pie.

115 Killgore Trout Fri, Sep 17, 2010 6:54:28pm

Instaracist declares taxpayers are Obama’s Negroes…

And — to take things beyond the Obama question — on a similar moral plane. In fact, if you look at a Marxist Utopia — say, Cuba — what you’ll see is basically a plantation. At the top, you’ve got the Massa and his family — Fidel, Raul, et al. — followed by various layers of overseers — the Communist Party apparat, the secret police — and House Negroes — e.g., the state-controlled media — all living off the surplus labor of the Field Negroes, whose produce is disposed of not according to their own desires (that would be capitalism!) but according to their betters’. This, we’re told, is for the best, since they aren’t smart enough to make their own decisions anyway, and the Massa looks after them with food, housing, and health care. Slaveholders even defended their system as more humane and less exploitative than atomistic capitalism, conveniently ignoring the role of the lash, just as apologists for Marxism conveniently ignore the role of the gulag.

Hmmm…I wonder where I’ve seen that argument before?

By the way Chuckles, the only old white face you see is the puffy one staring back at you in the mirror every morning when you shave.

119 Cato the Elder Fri, Sep 17, 2010 6:56:19pm

re: #68 Charles

Black president against a sea of old white faces. Oh no. No racism here.

Note Obama standing with his foot on the Declaration.

This is Nazi Realism at its finest.

  1. Arachne
    September 18, 2010 at 8:36 am | #1

    Killgore says he’s not “proud of it” – uh, then why did you DO it, asshat? No one had a gun to your family. You ran off in the middle of the night, when the admins of the board are sleeping, and leave comments. You didn’t do it in the middle of the day, when the board was active, and the comments were able to be monitored. And as far as posting under your “LGF” name – oh please, what bravery. If you really believed that those right wingers were evil and violent, you’d have been scared shitless at retribution.

    And the Mansion Minions and their cultish boss have yet to explain how “Wookie” is a racist term. Takes a certain amount of convoluted reasoning to turn a fictional character into a racial slur – hell, Jar Jar Binks I can understand, but a wookie – near as I can tell a Wookie’s a sort of bear.

    And KKKilgore, I’ll say it again – if you are adverse to the “n” word, as decent people are – there is not a single damn situation where you will be able to bring yourself to use it.

    • Speranza
      September 18, 2010 at 8:48 am | #2

      Kkkillgore did it all for the love of a fat, unemployed, middle aged man!

    • My Little Ponytail
      September 18, 2010 at 10:47 am | #3

      He’s not proud of it, but he’s crowing about it? Yeah.

  2. Village Idiot’s Apprentice
    September 18, 2010 at 8:38 am | #4

    ” BTW, the reason I said it took balls was because you posted under your
    LGF name. You weren’t chicken shit like the stalkers who are afraid to use their blogmocracy names at their site stalking Charles 24/7. You laid your reputation on the line, I admire a man of principle.”

    Oh crap.
    Was I supposed to change my nic to something else?
    No one ever tells me anything around here.

    So Chuck and Kilgore…
    you guys still gonna stick with that story about how no one gets banned over there without a reason?
    Or has that statement gone down the rabbit hole like how many other subtle changes and deletions that have taken place as Chuck furiously combs through 5 years of his comments seeing what he needs to change to reflect the new “enlightened” mind set over there?

    And seriously Kilgore, what definition of “stalking” are you using that allows you to read comments over at other sites, drag the gist of the comment to the swamp for discussion, but allows you in your mind to not label that action as “stalking”.

    I really would like to know what it is, because it seems like you are doing the very same actions, but somehow manage to avoid labeling yourself as a “stalker”.

    At least this site has the transparency to put
    “Keeping an eye on Icarus” right on the masthead.
    Not much more needs to be said beyond that.
    It’s almost like a Mission Statement.
    Nice, clear, unambiguous.

    • NoMo
      September 18, 2010 at 9:32 am | #5

      ” BTW, the reason I said it took balls was because you posted under your
      LGF name. You weren’t chicken shit like the stalkers who are afraid to use their blogmocracy names at their site stalking Charles 24/7. You laid your reputation on the line, I admire a man of principle.”

      That right there is pure BS.We all know the trouts widdle balls are in safe keeping at the gated community. Right next to the fruit and water.

      • Arachne
        September 18, 2010 at 9:54 am | #6

        What a total bunch of dolts. I posted at this site under my Blogmocracy nic until I thought it would be fun to adopt a nic in keeping with the Greek Mythology theme of Daedalus. Of course such whimsy is lost on the Loozards.

      • Arachne
        September 18, 2010 at 9:57 am | #7

        I love that “laid your reputation on the line” bullshit. Like no one in the blogosphere didn’t know KKKilgore was a closet racisst until his raid on Hot Air. I wonder what part of the plan to make LGF the “premier site for political discourse” that little stunt fell fell in to.

      • wolfie
        September 18, 2010 at 1:03 pm | #8

        Killgore is a NOBODY. To the extent that he has ANY reputation at all, it is in a narrow internet community that rightly regards him as a morally illiterate baby, deserving of nothing but scorn and derision.

  3. Village Idiot’s Apprentice
    September 18, 2010 at 10:05 am | #9

    I’m guessing that a real set of balls would be for Kilgore to contact an Admin via e-mail to verify it’s actually him, and not someones sock.
    Then have an admin post that it really is him, and have Kilgore post over here.
    Then he could say something like…

    “I realized that it was unfair for me to take pot shots over at the swamp, when the people I am commenting about have had their voices silenced by banning. So I have come over here where we could have an honest debate, with comments allowed by all parties. Then after that, I am going to go to Blogmocracy, and engage the people I have been commenting about without the safety net of them not being allowed to respond when I share my deep thoughts.”

    That would be an honest attempt to grow a set.

    The chance of that happening is ranked right there with monkeys flying out of my butt, playing bag pipes, with baby grand pianos strapped to their backs.

    • wolfie
      September 18, 2010 at 12:58 pm | #10

      Bullseye.

  4. spaceallah
    September 18, 2010 at 10:25 am | #11

    I post under this name because I hate spacejesus, who needs a fist in the face. There’s no way I’d be able to say a word about him when he talks shit about the south at lgf so I have my say here, which is obviously effective because they can’t go a day without commenting on what transpires here.

  5. spaceallah
    September 18, 2010 at 10:27 am | #12

    Arachne :
    I love that “laid your reputation on the line” bullshit. Like no one in the blogosphere didn’t know KKKilgore was a closet racisst until his raid on Hot Air. I wonder what part of the plan to make LGF the “premier site for political discourse” that little stunt fell fell in to.

    Nobody knows who the real person is behind the screen name, so how could he be risking anything real?

    • Iron Fist
      September 18, 2010 at 12:14 pm | #13

      I’ve had my suspicions that “Charles” and “KKKTrout” are one and the same person even before I was banned. Nothing I have seen in the time since then give me any reason to doubt that. I am certain Charles has socks. He always did, and not just Stinky the janitor.

      • My Little Ponytail
        September 18, 2010 at 12:29 pm | #14

        I’ve suspected the opposite – it isn’t that one Chuck has many socks, but that there’s more than one “Chuck”. The writing style shifts around pretty dramatically.

        That could be drugs, too.

      • September 18, 2010 at 8:09 pm | #15

        I have no doubt that Chuckles has socks.

        But what I want to know is this: does Chuckles even know that he has socks?

      • African Moondog
        September 20, 2010 at 5:56 am | #16

        Fisty is not the firstt pperson to have these suspicions.
        Check out this comment in one of the earliest LGF2 posts:

        “KILGORE TROUT IS CHARLES
        22 | August 14, 2008 19:24

        I think killgore trout is really Charles.”

  6. garycooper
    September 18, 2010 at 10:47 am | #17

    That whole fatuous exchange between the racist fish and his porcine master is perfectly representative of the kind of discourse you get over there now. It’s impossible to watch now, like trying to sit through Ed-Olbie-Madcow of an evening.

    Oh, and where is the Lewd Wig? I need to speak with him about some important developments in the field of climatology. Don’t tell me Chunky has retired his favorite pet manque!

    • Arachne
      September 18, 2010 at 11:06 am | #18

      Precisely. He posts five or six threads about Christine O’Donnell, who, if you believe Chunky, has no chance of winning, so why the hell should he care. He’s all about the raaaaacism now, as if he and he alone is the final arbiter. Therefore, he feigned annoyance at KKKilgore’s late-night foray, but neither admonished him or banned him for it. Hence, he approved whole-heartedly of it and I refuse to believe KKKilgore didn’t run it by the Grand Inquisitor before he did it – he would have had to make sure a banning wouldn’t be in order.

      Other libturd sites might have outwardly enjoyed KKKilgore’s stunt, but the act was not all that well received. People thought it a cheap shot thing to do, and KKKilgore’s use of certain words which were NOT being used on Hot Air to make a point made the Swamp pretty much an outcast after that. No one is clamoring to join. He’s become irrelevant. Like I said, his biggest fear is to go to this site and find even we’ve grown weary of him and shut it down for lack of interest in the subject matter.

      • My Little Ponytail
        September 18, 2010 at 11:53 am | #19

        It’s like the D’Souza piece. If it’s that wacky, why are they spending their energy on it?

      • wolfie
        September 18, 2010 at 1:44 pm | #20

        “He’s all about the raaaaacism now, as if he and he alone is the final arbiter.”

        He’s got a serious case of Pope-envy! He is the vicar on earth of the ideological purity god!
        Unlike the actual Pope, who must base all judgments on Scripture, reason, and tradition — on something clearly outside his own opinions or feelings — Chunky has a direct and mystical line to the will of the multicult divinity. He has the gnosis! The spirit of correctness falls upon him like tongues of fire on the apostles! Hallelujah!

      • My Little Ponytail
        September 18, 2010 at 2:17 pm | #21

        So he’s not the Race Detective, he’s the Pope of the Church of Raceotology.

  7. poteen
    September 18, 2010 at 11:07 am | #22

    EVERYTHING is racism. Damn they’re pathetic. I’d wager not one left over there has left the house long enough to encounter a truly racist skinhead gangster OR a 17 yr old black gangster who blames his thug life on ‘whitey’.

    • Arachne
      September 18, 2010 at 11:47 am | #23

      If they ever did encounter a real raaaaacist – they’d need a change of underwear and a lifetime supply of Depends.

  8. Iron Fist
    September 18, 2010 at 12:27 pm | #24

    Oh, and let me note that I post here under my LGF/Blogmocracy nick every day. I guess that makes me special to Cato. What a revolting thought.

    • Arachne
      September 18, 2010 at 12:33 pm | #25

      If the non-thought-processing Manson Minions over at the Swamp can’t figure out my Blogmocracy/former LGF nic from my writing style, location hints and use of certain idioms, they really aren’t paying attention.

      • Iron Fist
        September 18, 2010 at 12:35 pm | #26

        :P

        Who are you again?
        :mrgreen:

  9. wolfie
    September 18, 2010 at 12:46 pm | #27

    “Could not agree more,” says Chucky, as RP praises KKKT’s heroism and virtue!

    But, but Charles, you ORIGINALLY said you couldn’t “applaud” what KKKT did and that you would never have done it yourself. You were eager to assure the lizards that you did not put KKKT up to this trickery, thus showing that you infact knew it was morally wrong.

    To be sure, we can’t accuse you of CHANGE in this case, since the original statement distancing yourself from the deed was patently false, considering your celebration of KKKT’s juvenile stunt in several threads.

    The fact is that what KKKT did was morally vile. No decent person would do it or approve of it. And I don’t care whether you’re talking about doing it to Hot Air or the Daily Kos. VILE. TREACHEROUS. DESPICABLE.

    • Arachne
      September 18, 2010 at 12:59 pm | #28

      Disagreeing with or downdinging Chunky = bannable offense.

      Raiding another site and posting the “n” word hoping it will stay up for hours to prove a point = feigned annoyance and continued posting privileges.

      Result: Morally bankrupt blog owner with no sense of shame and certainly in no position to criticize ANYONE for ANYHING ever again.

  10. wolfie
    September 18, 2010 at 12:55 pm | #29

    “My stunt made no difference,” sniffs Killgore.

    Oh, I don’t know. It exposed the moral depravity of your master.
    I won’t credit the stunt for destroying LGF. It was circling the drain long before then. But I think it utterly destroyed — on both the right and the left — whatever tiny remnant of credibility CJ made have had.

  11. Arachne
    September 18, 2010 at 1:01 pm | #30

    Iron Fist :

    :P

    Who are you again?

    :mrgreen:

    Chunky should use my nic – no one spins a web of lies like he can.

  12. Ricardo Multiban
    September 18, 2010 at 1:02 pm | #31

    Sure, it takes real balls to throw around the N-word in the middle of the night. And real balls to act like it’s no big deal. Real balls to violate one’s principles by excusing it after the fact.

    When someone like Rush uses silly parody to call out the racism on the left, he’s called a race-baiter. When KT defaces a site with N-bombs he’s making sacrifices for the greater good. Real balls would have been to call it what it really is. Fortunately for KT some animals really are more equal than others.

    • Iron Fist
      September 18, 2010 at 1:19 pm | #32

      Real balls to violate one’s principles by excusing it after the fact.

      Oh, KKKTrout didn’t violate his principles at all. Of that you can be confident.

      • Ricardo Multiban
        September 18, 2010 at 1:44 pm | #33

        That was in reference to their master who sees racism and misogyny everywhere except right in front of him.

    • wolfie
      September 18, 2010 at 1:49 pm | #34

      OT- You win the Best Nic for the Blog prize!

  13. WASVS
    September 18, 2010 at 1:08 pm | #35

    If it’s racist to call Michelle ‘Wookie’ or ‘Klingon’, then can we call her a ‘nasty, angry, hateful b-tch’ without being accused of racism?

    • wolfie
      September 18, 2010 at 1:58 pm | #36

      No. ;)

  14. Formercorpsman
    September 18, 2010 at 1:12 pm | #37

    What the fuck is their shit laced with? For crying out loud, did I just read that?

    Balls?
    Posting under a NIC, and not a sock?

    You’ve just gotta laugh. Chickenshit.

  15. wolfie
    September 18, 2010 at 1:26 pm | #38

    Cato says:
    “Has anyone here but me ever actually read Marx?

    Because, you know, he is highly regarded in capitalist circles as the single greatest authority on their system…”

    Yes, Cato, I have read A LOT of Marx.

    I also know what people “in capitalist circles” have to say. (My father was an economist and I know quite a few people in the field— many of them liberals, BTW.) Your statement that Marx “is highly regarded as the single greatest authority” on the capitalist system is utterly laughable.

    You would never have made such an ignorant, silly statement on the old LGF. Never. And if by chance you did, you know damned well you’d never get away with it.

    You do realize that, for all the jollies an intelligent fellow gets swaggering around in a sea of pea-brains, there is always the tendency —perhaps the inevitability— of sinking to the community norm.
    Congratulations, Cato!

    • My Little Ponytail
      September 18, 2010 at 2:24 pm | #39

      DTs.

      • Iron Fist
        September 18, 2010 at 2:26 pm | #40

        Think he’s gotten into Chuck’s stash? That is some powerful shit he is ingesting…

  16. refugee000
    September 18, 2010 at 2:12 pm | #41

    I have to laugh.
    They call everyone “racist”, “haters”, all while failing to see that they have become a left wing hate site.
    They hate middle America, they smear anyone that says they are republican as a racist, a bigot or a “wingnut”…then they get apoplectic if anyone dares to point out Islamic intolerance.

  17. poteen
    September 18, 2010 at 2:35 pm | #42

    They call everyone “racist”, “haters”, all while failing to see that they have become a left wing hate site…………………………..

    Not even that. Nothing more than a joke to either side in the blog world and insignificant to unknown outside that world. Quite unlike the published authors, TV and radio commentators so regularly sniped at there.

    • Arachne
      September 18, 2010 at 3:49 pm | #43

      Jealousy is an ugly thing – and is on exhibit daily at Swamp.

      Hey Chunky – how are those monthly subscriptions coming along.

      Oh man…I just saw an ad for that new series “Law and Order – L.A.” At the end of it, the words “more colorful” (NBC’s catch phrase for its new season) appear across the image of the Black lawyer.

      RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!!!!

  18. Crashnburn01
    September 18, 2010 at 3:57 pm | #44

    Think Chuckie would allow any “stalkers” back into the swamp under their current nic or hell, even their old LGF one and then allow them to honestly comment or attempt to discuss something without instant and incessant screeching from the crowd there to “BAN THEM!!!!” ? Are they really as ignorant as to believe that such a thing would be allowed or welcomed by the Husky Blogger? Or desired by anyone here? Mold, rats and washed up jazz guitarists with massive inferiority complexes don’t like daylight, kids…

  19. refugee000
    September 18, 2010 at 6:20 pm | #45

    Here’s something for the littlegreendhimi stalkers

    http://siteanalytics.compete.com/jihadwatch.org+littlegreenfootballs.com/

    rotfl!

    • September 18, 2010 at 8:11 pm | #46

      Jihad Watch is a wonderful blog. They DESERVE to become one of the primary sites in the blogosphere. Spencer and his helpers are finally seeing the fruit of many years of honest scholarship, hard work, and courage.

    • The Osprey
      September 18, 2010 at 8:23 pm | #47

      if you play around with the monthly view and set it for one year you can see that JW beat Chuckles in 11/2009 as well…probably during to the Mumbai Massacre. IIRC Chuck barely covered it at all and JW had extensive coverage.

  20. September 18, 2010 at 9:54 pm | #48

    My Little Ponytail :
    He’s not proud of it, but he’s crowing about it? Yeah.

    He ran over in the early hours of the morning to burn a cross. Yep. He’s a brave warrior, with a coat of arms that looks a lot like a limp white penis. I wonder what all his black friends thought about his infantile little prank. Oh wait… he’s only heard of black people.

  21. Name required
    September 19, 2010 at 2:57 am | #49

    Arachne :
    I love that “laid your reputation on the line” bullshit.

    And what a reputation it is, especially after that.

  22. September 19, 2010 at 8:09 am | #50

    Can someone explain to me how the terms “wookie” and Klingon are racist when ascribed to Michelle Obama? I know Killgore Trout tried to expose Hot Air as a site harboring racist comments, but if that’s his idea of racist, how was he successful in his ignoble quest?

  23. Heracles
    September 19, 2010 at 1:10 pm | #51

    Every September 17 will be Killgore Trout racist anniversary day.

  24. CharlesJohnsonLooneyTunes
    September 20, 2010 at 6:17 pm | #52

    can someone explain to me someone who defends harry reid and bill clinton’s racist comments has good standing to cry foul about racism

  25. CharlesJohnsonLooneyTunes
    September 20, 2010 at 6:17 pm | #53

    can someone explain to me how someone who defends harry reid and bill clinton’s racist comments has good standing to cry foul about racism

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 696 other followers