Marjorie Moon calls Christianity Paganism
September 24, 2010
Marjorie Moon has exposed herself as a Christophobe. She calls Christianity Paganism, a smear used by Muslims. She then claims that Islam is closer to Judaism! This is news to me since Islam is about conquering the world, while Judaism is an ethnic specific religion and its adherents want to be left alone, not conquer. Clearly she hates Christians and is bigoted towards us.
This is one of the most ignorant statements I have ever read. Christianity comes from Judaism and although through the ages there are differences, it’s more due to ceremonies and local cultures. Marjorie Moon is a bigot and this statement shows that.
The stupid! It burns!
It’s really raining today at LGF. Man so much ignorance.
Crucify her…
Ha ha ha ha ha!
That’s an islamic talking point, the claim that the trinity constitutes polytheism.
Moon’s a muzz.
Yup, it’s a Muzzie talking point. She’s Muzz sympathizer.
Yup. Taqqiya spout.
And polytheism, i.e.”shirk”, is considered the worst sin, the one unforgivable transgression, worse than murder. Furthermore, while the Trinity is deemed idolatrous, so is rejecting Shari’a law and thus preferring to rule by “man-made” law, because, according to the doctors of the Islamic deen, rejecting Shari’a in favor of “taghut” means that one rejects the status of Allah as sole legislator and governor, thus propping up “idols” beside Allah.
Well, I dunno.
Now, if she starts claiming that the Virgin Mary is the 3rd person of the Trinity, we can at least conclude that all she “knows” about Christian theology she learned from Muslims.
I completely get the flaming moonbat idea that she spit out “No thing, including man, can take it’s place.”
These asswipes actually feel that humanity is the source of everything and can achieve perfection.
It’s the only way to square Statism. Believing that allowing humans to be in charge of other humans, just so they’re the RIGHT humans, is the only way to justify Statism in the human mind, unless you KNOW that Statism is evil and you’re just EVIL.
It sounds like Marjorie is the former.
It proves my theory that Obama voters are either STUPID or EVIL.
This is too funny!
128 Charles
Fri, Sep 24, 2010 12:49:00pm replyquote 0downupreport
By the way, for the past few days, several of the chuckleheads from the stalker blogs have been trying to register sock puppet accounts here.
“Chuckleheads”?
I thought all the “chuckleheads” were at The Swamp.
How can WE be the chuckleheads when LGF has the grand poobah Chuckles?
He must think he has his Mighty Corrolator Tool™ working again. I imagine it sucks when your Tool is broke. If he wants to pretend it is working again, I guess I understand.
Spanka teh manque tends to break tools.
Yes, there is a secret coordinated effort to get sock puppets registered at LGF. ROFL Johnson is paranoid and demented.
Shhh! He’ll find out that we’re coordinating sock accounts and passwords at chuckyspankeymanquey.com
I don’t see Reine and other Christians countering Marjorie. They are cowards letting our faith get smeared that way.
There was a brief period at LGF, back during the evolution tedium, when being a Catholic was cool. (The High Priest Charles had decided he approved of Catholic teaching on evolution!) Chuckles would run videos of Ken Miller, calling him a “devout Catholic”— with great approval! Reine boasted proudly of her Church’s manifest superiority to those icky “Creationist fundies.” Why, Sharmuta was seriously considering conversion!
I remember thinking back then how nasty and foolish the posters like Reine were to attack their Protestant brothers and how the tide was bound to turn. No matter what Chuckles claimed, it was clear that the whole evolution schtick was just a front in an anti-Christian assault. (People like BabbaZee, Gagdad Bob, and Song&Dance saw that immediately.)
I always liked Reine, but after she signed up to be Sharmuta’s little helper and started prancing around like a prisy hall monitor, and after she started sneering at evangelicals, I lost respect for her. Ah well.
Don’t expect her to counter Marjorie. She’ll gladly defend LGF. The Church? Nah.
Weirod!
“No matter what Chuckles claimed, it was clear that the whole evolution schtick was just a front in an anti-Christian assault. (People like BabbaZee, Gagdad Bob, and Song&Dance saw that immediately.)”
I didn’t see it then. I do now.
lol,any similarities between Judaism and pisslam is purely by design.The muzzies couldn’t resist perverting the stuff they liked and claiming it as their own.
Marjorie Moon? She don’t eat meat/but she sure love the bone!
She loves Muzzies!
I wonder whose sock she is.
There are NO defenders of any branch of Christianity at LGF? That ain’t right.
They wouldn’t be welcomed. So when faced with the choice of hiding their faith or leaving LGF, they seem to have made their choice. That is sad.
They are cowards.
Many of us stayed on there too long, compromising our beliefs and integrity.
(And yes, it’s sad.)
I was one of those cowards, so I personally cannot belittle them for that.
I can, however, accuse them of bad taste.
The LGF I clung to had already been diminished, but it still had an abundance of fine commenters, from buzzsawmonkey to zombie, from goddess to Iron Fist. Now what do they have? Pretty thin gruel to sell out for!
hehe
118 Charles Fri, Sep 24, 2010 12:41:04pm replyquote
9
down
up
report
I’m posting this here so that people know the truth behind the Cato banning, because certain numbskulls are trying to make a big deal of it. This was my answer to RememberTonyC in another thread…
***
re: #231 _RememberTonyC
Not only that — he actually did a full-on flounce at least twice and announced he was done with LGF — but I didn’t block his account, because I wanted to give him a chance to reconsider. At least twice. And once he followed this up with an angry email to me.
I gave him many more chances than I’d give most people. In return, he acted like a complete asshole for no reason. I’ll give people chances when they’ve been at LGF for a long time, but I will only be pushed so far.
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/3830/blackstonekaba.jpg
Marjorie MoRon
Maybe that’s what Marjoriemoon feels, but it’s not reciprocated. The very first sura in the Qur’an argues against that sentiment:
The traditional Muslim identification of this sura is that
Why I am I stuck on the “moon” reference in her name now?
MajorieMoon might be surprised to find that it is Islam which is rooted in paganism and pagan rituals. The god they worship, Allah, was a pagan moon god. The procession around the Kaba along with the white robes, is also rooted in paganism.
Do your homework MajorieMoon before you post such nonsense.
Majoriemoon, you’re an ignorant and stupid. You’ve never been to India or to Pakistan,right ? Otherwise you would know how many “shrines” there are where Muslims make a pilgrimage to pray there to their “saints”. Very similar to Christians.
One reason why Abd al-Wahhab “reformed” Islam and invented Wahhabism was his disgust with all the shrines and “stones” which were called sacred. This is not only true fro Sunni Islam but for Shia Islam too.
Did you know, you dumbass, that in the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus is the shrine of John the Baptist and that this is a holy place for Muslims ? Go there and you’ll find hundreds of Muslims every day before the shrine to pray there.
Iran is plastered with shrines similar to sacred places in Christianity.
Or would you prefere to go to Morocco ? Same situation all over the Muslim world. Every Muslim country has her shrines and sacred places like Christian countries.
I know I’m OT but this is thread-worthy
60 LudwigVanQuixote
Fri, Sep 24, 2010 11:41:44am replyquote 0downupreport
re: #42 jamesfirecat
To be fair the hatred of Mohammed cartoons probably has at least a part due to his command not to be shown in images or whatever it was that he said along those lines as opposed to most dictators who frequently can’t/couldn’t get enough of putting their faces on things, be it money, stamps, or statues…
I hear your point, but I could find links to several hundred medieval religious Muslim works with depictions of Mohammed.
[Link: scienceblogs.com...]
Snip
Ok, the link goes to scienceblog ( http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/05/mohammed_is_defiledbut_its_a_v.php )
but from there to: dadam !!!
zombie!!
http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/
So, LvQ links to zombietime to make his point
” LvQ links to zombietime to make his point”
Off with his head!
For anyone else, that would be a bannable offense.
“So, LvQ links to zombietime to make his point”
But you forgot the algebra angle. LVQ linked to someone who linked to Zombie, and since link culpability decreases as the inverse square of the number of links, his offense is actually diminished by … umm … carry the two … ummm … where’s my calculator…
ROFL!
Linking to Zombie is verboten! Lewd Wig could face disciplinary action, but more likely, the post will be scrubbed by Chunky.
But I had a good laugh
I assume that LvQ – the lgf-google-mouse – didn’t even check the source. He was happy to find another one than zobietime but was trapped again with zombietime. Call him little stupid ?
Get this:
Random ooo-ooo, you say?
marjoriemoon meet SanFranciscoZionist.
Oh yea, look at this:
113 marjoriemoon
Fri, Sep 24, 2010 12:31:46pm replyquote 1downupreport
re: #105 imp_62
I think theology – Christian, Muslim, and Jewish – is far more complicated and complex than you can adequately portray here. Dangerous waters and I don’t suggest you tarry. Plus, unless you have an advanced degree in comparative theology, I don’t think you are in a position to posit declarative statements about Jihad.
Regarding Jihad, the Temple I used to belong to did a lot of interfaith work. The imam would talk to our congregation. This is what was described to me by Muslims I met. That Jihad is an inner struggle, not an outer one.
—————-
You know, the inner struggle of Jihad destroyed the WTC, kills thousands of people every year in terror attacks, blows up Mosques etc. Everything inner struggle. Is she realy that stupid ?
“The foreign policy of the Islamic state must be to carry the Islamic mission to the world by way of Holy War. This process has been established through the course of the ages…this process has never been changed at all. The Apostle Muhammad from the time he founded the State in the city of Yathrib, prepared an army and began holy war to remove the physical barriers which hinder the spread of Islam…
By holy war, kingdoms and states were removed and Islam ruled the nations & peoples. The glorious Qur’an has revealed to Muslims the reasons for fighting, to carry the message of Islam to the entire world…
If we besiege the infidels, we would call them to embrace Islam first…if they reject Islam, they have to pay the poll tax. If they pay it they spare their blood and properties but if they refuse to pay the poll tax, then fighting them becomes lawful…these words and principles are confirmed by all the Muslim scholars. The Apostle of God had designed the plan of conquest before his death, then after him, his successors undertook the responsibility of implementing this plan when they started conquering the countries. People’s resistance or rejection does not matter because the Islamic system is for all people in all countries.”—“The Book of the Islamic State” (1953) by al-Nabhani (founder of Hizb ut-Tahrir)
That’s no fair, actually knowing something about which you speak.
“Is she really that stupid?”
Why, yes, she is!
Not unintelligent necessarily, but truly STUPID in the literal sense, as in being in a stupor.
I’d say bound and determined to come to a stupid conclusion. A lot of that going on.
Good little dhimmi,pat pat pat.
Of course she is. “There is no God, but God” is a dead giveaway.
The moon part is a giveaway, too. I mean what, again, do they worship?
But this is the most shocking, most insane balderdash I’ve ever read about Christianity and communion in specific:
185 iceweasel
Fri, Sep 24, 2010 1:38:52pm replyquote 3downupreport
re: #174 goddamnedfrank
Against my better judgement I’ll take it one step further. I think Communion is a ritualized substitute for cannibalism.
Of course it is. It almost exactly parallels Dionysian (and other, older) myths and rituals– involving a victim, a blood sacrifice, and the ritualistic dismemberment and cannibalisation of the victim, followed three days (or some indeterminate time later) by a resurrection.
Walter Burkhert’s book Homo Necans is good on this IIRC.
—–
Are you nuts you stupid ? You’ve neither read Homo Necans (or you never understood what you’ve read) nor do you have a clue of Christianity and theology respectively. You don’t know what you’re writing about. The communion is the transsubstituion of food, a metamorphosis from nature to culture. This has nothing to do with cannibalism but with the fear to destroy the world, the same world you need to live on. When Christ refers to himself as grapevine he refers to ancient fertility myths not to cannibalism. Dionysus comes to mind not a cannibal. What the church did was to eliminate the nature out of the transsubstition, but this has nothing to do with cannibalism.
Jesus is the new Emmanuel Goldstein, and they’re having their two minutes hate, hot and heavy.
Has Iceweasel ever posted anything negative about Islam?