I may stand corrected. LGF is like a bar in a rough neighborhood, and CJ is like the “Soup Nazi” of bartenders. Complete with the regular gang of bullies delivering the “haven’t seen you around here” attitudes, along with some hawker in your face trying to sell you shit (the bartender charges $10 ” protection”).
 | Bunk X on Does Charles think he’s … |
| Bunk X on Does Charles think he’s … |
| Bunk X on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | panoftheforest on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | Arachne on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | haysoos on Does Charles think he’s … |
| Bunk X on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | garycooper on Does Charles think he’s … |
| Bunk X on Does Charles think he’s … |
| Bunk X on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | snowcrash on Does Charles think he’s … |
| panoftheforest on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | Briareus on Does Charles think he’s … |
 | doppelganger @ Lozer… on Does Charles think he’s … |
| Arachne on Does Charles think he’s … |
The Blogmocracy
“piss off” is a British-ism. Just sayin’.
Also, if he wants to make his site a pay firewall site, then just do it. Don’t p*ssyfoot around and go on wholesale banning sprees of people who refuse to subscribe or haven’t done so in a speed to your liking or hold up their internet speed as a hostage in order to wring some cash out of them. Either do it or don’t do it.
But I guess the psychological boner you get (“Hey, Unmatahari! Look at me ban some more people!”) must generate a mythical currency other than American Greenbacks that magically pays your bills, because (obviously) your pay me or suffer sh!tty service “protection” scam isn’t working.
The ironic thing is that the simpleton didn’t figure out that the subscription idea would have worked when his blog was dominated by people, who, for the most part, had jobs.
But now that’s become a full-fledged moonbat, and most of the posters at his cultist blog are, like him, unemployed moonbats, he can’t figure out why his idea isn’t bringing in the revenue he expected.
Here’s an idea, fat ass, no charge. See if your moronic posters can use their EBT cards to subscribe to your shithole.
And the next logical inference is…?
The “British-ness” you speak of lends credence to the concept that Chuckles the blogger isn’t actually “Charles” the blogger. What other reprehensible individual is a Brit on that blog…. mmmmm lets see….
Crackpot Charlie is a tough guy behind his keyboard. I would love to see him try to act tough to someone face to face.
So….Chunky the Wonder Twit banned the dude/dudette because they said they weren’t going to pay to play on his fabulous website of premium political discourse? Oh, say it’s not so!
And they won’t buy his stupid cookbook!
Can someone relate what St. Louis Card said to rile al-Chuki so?
All the posts seem to be deleted. I was looking at “Bottom Comments” earlier and SLC was there with 20 something downdings on each post.
SLC sounds like good people
427 St. Louisville Cards Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:02:55am replyquote
* -7
* down
* up
* report
re: #420 Gus 802
I didn’t bring it up today, I was responding to people spreading lies or miss information about the situation. I thought Charles always tried to defend his posters as reasonable down the middle, but I’ve seen mostly jumping the gun on all kinds of assumptions from people here. Again part of that blame goes to Charles for trying to posit this as a privatization issue in his original post.
429 St. Louisville Cards Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:06:40am replyquote
* -4
* down
* up
* report
re: #425 Slap
“Liberal Echo Chamber”???
Hoo-boy.
Yes, when multiple people here keep repeating the same misunderstanding of the situation because they haven’t bothered to read on the issue, I’d call that an echo chamber. Dismiss it if you’d like, but if walks like duck…
434 St. Louisville Cards Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:12:19am replyquote
* -3
* down
* up
* report
re: #432 Gus 802
The dozens of libertarian/tea party comments would be what I’m talking about.
435 Charles Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:12:58am replyquote
* 8
* down
* up
* report
re: #422 St. Louisville Cards
You may now piss off.
422 St. Louisville Cards Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:00:14am replyquote
* -16
* down
* up
* report
Sorry I’m not a member of liberal echo chamber that is LGF. Outside of defense issues, rarely if ever have I seen anything remotely conservative or libertarian.
Better living through state planning!!!
423 Gus 802 Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:01:10am replyquote
* 2
* down
* up
* report
re: #422 St. Louisville Cards
Why don’t you flounce and get it over with troll.
The arch anglophobe Nancy Johnson using a British expression….Heh…..
“Charles Johnson outs people using their Paypal information”…. His chickens are coming home to roost now eh?
I imagine the blog will die a sloooooow and painful death and one day Chunky wakes up and realizes that the only people he’s talking to are his sockpuppets.
not the best way to win people over to the tune of 10 bucks a month
First comment on a thread gets 21 downdings. Heh.
1 WaveriderCA Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:12:10am replyquote
* -21
* down
* up
* report
Voter’s ignorance seems to be a bipartisan tactic these days. Toss in some 1000 page legislative bills that get rammed through or just hide all the candidates from the truth. It’s really funny isn’t it how it’s the information age yet things seem more opaque than ever.
BTW– McSpiff is back after a timeout.
39 Charles Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:40:14am replyquote
* 1
* down
* up
* report
Correction: “frequent” may not be the right word; I don’t listen to Rush enough to know how frequently he subs for Rush. But he’s done it several times.
40 Walter L. Newton Tue, Oct 5, 2010 10:40:45am replyquote
* 0
* down
* up
* report
re: #39 Charles
Correction: “frequent” may not be the right word; I don’t listen to Rush enough to know how frequently he subs for Rush. But he’s done it several times.
He’s never substituted for Rush, not once.
Who are they talking about substituting for Rush?